Finance › Speeches › Trade, fragmentation and geopolitics

Trade, fragmentation and geopolitics

Tariffs, trade tensions, sanctions, wars and the fragmentation of the world economy. Over the last 12 months (5 November 2025 – 5 November 2026), 104 of the 345 speeches listed touch on this topic (30%); over the last 3 months the share is 36%.

Last updated 10 November 2026 · topic assigned by Dark Majestic from the title and our summary (method)

Institutions that mention it most (last 12 months)
InstitutionSpeeches
European Central Bank11
Bank of Canada9
Deutsche Bundesbank9
Bank Negara Malaysia7
Eurogroup7
European Securities and Markets Authority7
OECD6
Banca d'Italia6
PH
· Pablo Hernández de Cos Wiki · Bank for International Settlements WikiThe central bank balance sheet

ContextDelivered by the head of the Bank for International Settlements, the central banks' bank, whose mission is to support global monetary and financial stability and whose main challenge is a changing policy toolkit.

Why it mattersIt shows how the size of a central bank's balance sheet links to bank liquidity and financial stability, a design choice many central banks are now reconsidering.

Problems raised
  1. When banks hold fewer reserves, they lean harder on interbank lending and on selling securities to find cash.
  2. In stress, interbank markets can split apart, leaving some banks short of reserves at the end of the day.
  3. Reserve demand can swing unpredictably when banks that rarely trade become sources of sudden payment flows.
Solutions proposed
  1. Choose an operating framework that keeps a high level of excess reserves as a liquidity buffer for banks.
  2. Rely on reserves rather than other liquid assets to reduce banks' exposure to government debt.
  3. Study how tiering and other designs, as used in Japan and Sweden, affect market functioning before deciding.
Read the speech summary

1. The question and the scope

At the ECB's conference on money markets, Pablo Hernández de Cos asks how large the lasting footprint of a monetary authority's assets and liabilities should be once crises have passed. These portfolios swelled after the 2008 crisis and the pandemic, and have been shrinking in the euro area since 2022 and in many other economies. He sets aside emergency episodes and the lower-bound problem, concentrating on the reserves that commercial banks hold at the central bank. Two forces set their level: the operating framework, which fixes supply, and banks' own demand. Because financial systems, institutions and objectives differ, countries can reasonably draw different conclusions.

2. Operating frameworks

Frameworks differ by where supply meets the demand curve. In a corridor or scarce-reserves system, supply sits on the sloping part and banks forgo a positive return when they park reserves overnight, as in Brazil, India or Korea. Ample or abundant systems, such as the euro area's, push the market rate toward or below the deposit rate. Tiered designs pay a lower rate above a quota; Switzerland uses one to keep trading alive despite plentiful reserves. The ideal opportunity cost is debated: a textbook rule favours cheap, plentiful reserves, yet a large central bank footprint can distort allocation and crowd out private markets, while abundant liquidity can head off forced asset sales and scrambles for cash. Both effects coexist, so the net balance is hard to judge.

3. Monetary control and market functioning

Every framework can steer the policy stance, but with high reserves the operational target stays closer to the policy rate, since swings in currency demand or government deposits need no offsetting forecasts; scarce systems must intervene, though deviations are only a few basis points and do not seem to spread to other short rates. Plentiful reserves also let a central bank add liquidity without disturbing rate control. As reserves become abundant, trading incentives fade and interbank activity can wither; in Sweden around half of counterparties have taken part in no money market segment since 2020. Tiering sustains trading. Views differ on how much interbank turnover matters, since secured markets stay busy and supervision can supply discipline, and a recent ECB study finds unsecured lending carries higher regulatory costs than collateralised lending, though Japan's unsecured market recovered after tiering.

4. Financial stability

Abundant-reserve systems supply liquidity in advance, scarce ones provide it after stress appears, often at penalty rates against strict collateral. A large reserve cushion helps banks absorb shocks, lowers reliance on frozen interbank lending, forced sales of other liquid assets and emergency facilities, and trims banks' holdings of government bonds, weakening the sovereign-bank link. In stress, fragmented markets can leave some banks short at day's end. Yet the system may adapt to abundance in ways that raise fragility.

5. What drives reserve demand

Demand has risen over the past decade. Liquidity rules matter in different ways: intraday requirements or supervisory pressure behave like reserve requirements, whereas the standard coverage ratio can be met with other liquid assets, so it shows little link to reserve levels; reserves merely take a larger share as their opportunity cost falls. Frictions raise the insurance value of reserves: selling other liquid assets takes time, runs have become faster as the 2023 turmoil showed, borrowing from the central bank can carry stigma or lack operational readiness, and non-bank institutions may amplify swings in stress.

6. Endogenous effects and open questions

Demand may respond to the framework itself. When markets fragment, inactive banks act like autonomous factors whose payment flows move effective demand unexpectedly, and Swedish banks raised precautionary buffers as supply grew. High reserves may also encourage banks to take on more uninsured deposits and credit lines, leaving them more exposed if liquidity shrinks. Whether such effects can be undone as balance sheets fall is unresolved, though recent experience, including the euro area's, suggests a smooth reduction is achievable.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MC
· Mathias Cormann Wiki · OECD WikiInclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Plenary Meeting Opening, remarks by OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann

ContextOpening remarks at the 18th plenary of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework in Paris; the OECD promotes better policies for well-being, and its main challenge is keeping international tax rules coherent.

Why it mattersIt opens a plenary of 148 members that must decide how to follow up the global minimum tax and address tax rules for the digital economy.

Problems raised
  1. Public debt relative to output is higher than before the global financial crisis in nearly every G20 country.
  2. Developing countries still have limited access to country-by-country tax reports.
  3. Tax rules for the digital economy risk fragmentation and uncertainty for governments and firms.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep implementing the global minimum tax, which is estimated to cut profit shifting and lift revenues.
  2. Simplify peer reviews and widen developing countries' access to tax information.
  3. Reopen the digital economy discussion from evidence before setting priorities and next steps.
Read the speech summary

1. A decade of results

Opening the group's 18th plenary, Mathias Cormann notes that membership has grown from 82 to 148 since the first meeting in Kyoto, with Guatemala the newest. Members swapped gaps in tax rules for shared standards, added transparency and introduced a worldwide minimum tax on large multinationals. Profit per worker in investment hubs fell 27%, and the link between profit location and tax rates weakened by up to 40%. Roughly 65 jurisdictions apply the minimum tax, and a July study sees profit shifting dropping by a quarter to almost half while revenues rise 3 to 5% yearly.

2. Why work continues

Public debt exceeds pre-2008 levels in nearly every G20 economy and growth is slowing to 2.9%, so efficient, trusted tax systems matter more. Three priorities follow: make sure all members, especially developing ones, benefit through simpler reviews, wider access to country reports and training for about 150 000 officials; keep rules suited to change, with new work on mobile workers and on tax, inequality and growth, plus AI in administration and ageing societies.

3. Digital economy talks

The third priority is a constructive route on the tax questions raised by digitalisation. Members will restart the debate from evidence on how the sector evolved. Agreement will be hard, but the aim is to avoid fragmentation, protect tax bases and give firms and governments predictability, using the diversity of members as a strength.

Read full speech on oecd.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiRelease of the Monetary Policy Report

ContextOpening remarks at the press conference releasing the Monetary Policy Report, with the Senior Deputy Governor; the Bank of Canada protects the value of money, and its main challenge is energy-driven inflation.

Why it mattersIt accompanies the Bank of Canada's first rate increase since July 2023 and explains how energy prices and tariffs shaped that decision.

Problems raised
  1. Higher and persistent energy prices raise the risk of broader inflation.
  2. New United States tariffs create uncertainty and are expected to slow growth in the fourth quarter.
  3. Near-term inflation expectations have climbed even though longer-term ones remain anchored.
Solutions proposed
  1. Raise the policy rate by 25 basis points to 2.5% to limit spillover from energy costs.
  2. Move carefully, since further increases may be needed but the outlook is uncertain.
  3. Watch core inflation and the pass-through of energy prices to decide the next steps.
Read the speech summary

1. The decision

The Bank of Canada lifted its policy rate by a quarter point to 2.5%, its first increase since mid-2023. Two things changed since July: the inflation outlook worsened as the Middle East war keeps oil prices high, and the growth outlook improved slightly despite continuing US trade measures.

2. Economy and projections

Output expanded by 3.3% during the spring quarter, helped by consumers, energy and equipment investment, and resilient exports. Growth should dip at year end on new US tariffs, then recover to roughly 2% in 2027 and 2028 after 1% this year. Unemployment sits near 6.5% with some slack. Inflation hovers around 3%, may reach 3.5% by December, and returns near the 2% goal around mid-2028. Short-term expectations have risen; longer-term ones are anchored.

3. Why raise rather than hold

Holding was defended because inflation excluding gasoline is 2.2% and core measures are near 2%. Raising won because fuel costs stay high, firms are expected to pass on more costs, and recovery removes the cushion that would offset them. Council will decide meeting by meeting and may tighten again, carefully.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiIslamic finance for impact - the next measure of success

ContextSpeech at the 21st Kuala Lumpur Islamic Finance Forum; Bank Negara Malaysia safeguards monetary and financial stability and wants finance to serve the country's long-term goals.

Why it mattersProposes purpose rather than scale as the success test for Islamic finance and flags a Shariah contract framework paper due this year.

Problems raised
  1. Climate risk, ageing societies and geopolitical splits raise the bar for Islamic finance.
  2. Malaysia needs capital to flow to the right places to lift productive capacity.
  3. Judging success by scale alone misses the wider social purpose of the industry.
Solutions proposed
  1. Align strategies and capital with purpose, towards higher-value sectors and renewable energy.
  2. Offer risk-sharing products for food security and climate resilience.
  3. Review the Shariah contract framework and publish a strategy paper this year.
Read the speech summary

1. Beyond scale: what growth should achieve

Addressing the twenty-first edition of Malaysia's flagship Islamic finance forum, Bank Negara Malaysia Governor Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour argued that after decades spent building credibility, sophistication and size, Islamic finance should now be judged by what its growth makes possible. Climate pressures, ageing populations, broader development needs and a fragmented geopolitical order are changing what economies ask of finance.

2. A historical yardstick

He pointed to the Ottoman külliye complexes, where endowments funded schools, hospitals, libraries, welfare and trade around a mosque, and said such ecosystems were valued for the education, health, mobility and community wellbeing they sustained across generations. Resources mattered, but results mattered more. Success should therefore move from assets to outcomes, from compliance to the purpose behind the rules, and from the growth of finance to growth that finance enables.

3. Finance that empowers

Small firms generate almost 40% of Malaysian output and nearly half of jobs, yet face obstacles beyond credit. The social finance scheme iTEKAD combines funding with protection, skills and market access and has reached close to sixteen thousand participants; a home-based food entrepreneur who grew online and began exporting illustrates the intended result. Because every lending decision shapes the economy, capital allocation is an act of stewardship, and risk-sharing products, promoted through the i-CITA platform, should target food security and climate resilience.

4. What the central bank will do

The bank will enable responsible innovation, notably through its digital asset hub, review the Shariah contract framework with a strategy paper and exposure draft due this year, and carry the outcomes focus into the next financial sector blueprint. Three priorities follow: align capital with purpose, design products around the needs of underserved households and halal small firms, and keep fairness, integrity and empathy at the centre, with the higher objectives of Shariah as the compass.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MC
· Mathias Cormann Wiki · OECD WikiThe Next Fifty Years: Why Australia Must Choose Openness Over Drift

ContextOECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann gave the 2026 Neville Kennard Address on 17 October 2026 at the CIS Consilium 2026 in Sanctuary Cove, Queensland.

Why it mattersThe OECD chief links Australia's cost-of-living debate to weak competition and productivity, framing openness to trade and investment as the central long-term choice for the country.

Problems raised
  1. Australia risks drifting into slower growth.
  2. Weak competition lets firms raise prices without gaining productivity.
  3. Cost-of-living pressures have grown too high.
Solutions proposed
  1. Choose openness to trade and investment.
  2. Strengthen competition to lift productivity and incomes.
  3. Build broad public support for a long-term reform effort.
Read the speech summary

1. The occasion and the central argument

Mathias Cormann, OECD Secretary-General and a former Australian finance minister, gave this lecture for the fiftieth anniversary of the Centre for Independent Studies, a Sydney think tank known for promoting market reforms. His thesis is that Australia in 2026 looks a lot like Australia in 1976: living standards are stalling, the reform appetite has faded, and the popular remedies on offer would make things worse. He frames the whole talk around the issue voters rank first, the cost of living. In his view, most measures sold as cost-of-living relief only treat symptoms. The one durable way to make households better off, now and for the next generation, is to raise output per hour worked. Anything else either shifts the burden onto someone else or onto future taxpayers.

2. What the reform decades delivered

Cormann recalls that Australia ranked in the world's top five by income per head around 1950, then slid down the OECD rankings by the early 1980s while inflation and unemployment rose together. Over roughly two decades, governments of both sides then reversed course: tariff cuts starting in 1973; a floating dollar, financial deregulation, foreign banks, tariffs brought down to roughly 5%, enterprise bargaining and a national competition policy in the Hawke–Keating years; and, under Howard, an independent central bank with an inflation target, budget surpluses and debt repayment, the GST, lower company and capital gains taxes, financial-system reforms and further labour-market liberalisation. The payoff, he says, was labour productivity growth above two per cent a year in the 1990s, a competition-policy gain the Productivity Commission put at no less than 2.5 per cent of GDP, close to 29 years without recession, and real pay rises in most years. Later prosperity, he insists, was not just luck from Chinese demand: only a flexible economy could shift workers and capital into mining so fast and spread the windfall nationwide.

3. How the momentum was lost

From the mid-2000s, he argues, reform stopped across the whole political spectrum, in business and unions as well as in parliament, while the mining boom hid the cost. Reform is hard because its costs are immediate while its gains are delayed and diffuse; in good times voters see no need for it, and in bad times they reach for easy answers. The numbers he cites: since 2015, labour productivity has grown by less than 0.3% annually, compared with 1.6% on average over three decades and 2.2% at the height of the reforms; an OECD survey finding weaker competition, more concentrated markets, higher margins and construction productivity below its level of twenty years ago; real wages that dropped between late 2021 and mid-2024 and remained over 2% under their 2021 level at the start of 2026, something only six OECD members share; output per person falling for seven quarters in a row in 2023–24; and a combined federal-state shortfall close to 3.4% of national output in 2025, with outlays outpacing growth and bracket creep quietly raising revenue. The Productivity Commission estimates that returning productivity growth to its long-run average would make each Australian at least A$14 000 richer per year by 2035.

4. Why quick fixes do not lower living costs

Cormann ties expensive goods and stagnant pay to weak competition: under less pressure, firms raise prices and profits without improving efficiency. Productivity lowers production costs, competition limits margins, and handing out money without addressing either does not solve the problem. He goes through the usual alternatives. Cash payments and energy rebates add demand without adding output, so prices rise and the budget pays. Price caps reduce supply and turn the shortage into queues or outages. Tariffs raise costs for every farmer, miner and household. Mandated wage rises without more output lift prices rather than real pay, as Australia found in the 1970s.

5. The populist offer and his objections

He accepts that the complaints feeding populism are real: falling real incomes, young people unable to buy homes, higher energy bills, infrastructure lagging population growth and a sense of being ignored. But he argues that the solutions now gaining support were tried before and made Australia poorer. On manufacturing protection, he sees a tax on consumers and exporters that hits regional Australia hardest. On migration caps, he acknowledges that the public worry is mainly about housing, since for three years the population expanded about twice as fast as the housing stock, but says the remedy is more homes, infrastructure and services and a better skills mix. He cites OECD regional research showing that higher migration went with faster job growth for Australian-born workers and no measurable wage effect, notes that Australia's migrants are the best educated in the OECD, and stresses that without new arrivals the number of people of working age would already be falling, whereas projections show the OECD labour force declining by 13% and the EU's by 23%. He also defends foreign investment, which Australia has always relied on, and says a minerals exporter gains security by being a reliable, competitive supplier rather than by withdrawing. Politically, he observes that mainstream parties that copied populist economics lost support, while governments that delivered results, such as Greece under Kyriakos Mitsotakis and the coalition that won in Poland in 2023, weakened the populists. Lasting reform, he adds, requires public consent won through open debate.

6. Two factors that did not exist in 1976

The first is ageing. The median age has risen from about 28 to 38, and the number of working-age people for each person over 65 has fallen from more than seven to fewer than four, heading below three by the 2060s. With the working-age share set to decline, higher living standards must come mainly from higher output per hour, supported by a skills-based migration program matched by housing and services. The second is artificial intelligence, which he sees as the first innovation in decades capable of a large productivity jump. The Productivity Commission expects Australia, on present settings, to capture only about half the gain of the leading adopters, because the benefit depends on diffusion to small firms, hospitals, schools and councils. Shielding the country from it, he warns, would only leave Australia further behind.

7. His reform agenda

He proposes one measurable goal, lifting productivity growth to 1.6% annually within ten years, with federal payments to the states tied to reforms that are verified as delivered. Tax: shift the mix away from company and income taxes, which supply about 62 per cent of Australian revenue against roughly 35 per cent on average elsewhere in the OECD; widen the GST, charged at about half the typical OECD rate and on roughly half the usual base; replace stamp duty with land tax; index income-tax thresholds; and cut company tax, broadly as the 2010 Henry Review recommended. Competition and regulation: apply the renewed national competition policy with payments for results, adopt single national licences and approval processes with deadlines, and accept trusted foreign standards; restoring early-2000s competition could raise GDP by 1–3%, about 2 000 to 6 000 dollars per household a year. Housing: treat it as a supply problem, allow medium-density building near major public transport with approval within thirty days, use one national construction code and pay for homes completed, citing Auckland's 2016 zoning reform. Energy: a technology-neutral path to reliable clean power, no legal bans on any technology, a single national auction for firm capacity and faster approvals for transmission, storage and gas. Labour: quicker agreement approvals, much shorter awards and worker choice between casual and permanent work, with every change tested against jobs, real wages and productivity. Budget: a binding rule keeping real spending growth below economic growth until a structural surplus returns, policed by the Parliamentary Budget Office, including reform of care and disability-scheme costs. Trade: build on the new EU agreement and remove remaining small tariffs unilaterally. Schools: reverse two decades of falling PISA results, which declined despite about 40 per cent more real funding per student, through early phonics checks, explicit teaching and funding linked to course completion. Technology and migration: regulate AI through existing laws and regulators, approve data centres within twelve months, make public data open as the rule, and keep the migrant intake in line with home building.

8. The closing message

Cormann concludes that 2026 resembles 1976 in its drift but differs in two ways: Australia now has evidence of what works from its own reform era, and a new technology able to raise productivity. The real test, in his view, is whether today's leaders will accept short-term political costs for gains that arrive after the next election, as earlier leaders from both major parties did; each generation, he says, must win the argument again.

Read full speech on oecd.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiRemarks on the panel topic “Paths to prosperity - forging growth, trade and investment between Europe and Asia”

ContextPanel remarks by Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel at a Europe–Asia economic forum; the German central bank works for price stability while Europe rethinks its trade dependencies.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank head calls for broader trade links with Asia beyond China, framed around European competitiveness and sovereignty.

Problems raised
  1. Trade gains depend on shared rules that are eroding.
  2. China is both a key partner and a source of dependencies.
  3. Europe's competitiveness is lagging.
Solutions proposed
  1. Diversify ties with a broader group of Asian partners.
  2. Build cheap, reliable renewable energy and complete the savings union.
  3. Stay indispensable in critical value chains.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiIMFC Statement

ContextStatement by the ECB President to the IMF's steering committee at the Annual Meetings; the ECB keeps euro-area prices stable, and its main challenge is an energy-driven inflation surge.

Why it mattersIt gives the euro area's official view of inflation, energy and financial stability to the IMF's steering committee, during a period of high headline inflation.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East conflict and trade tensions keep energy markets volatile and weigh on confidence.
  2. Headline inflation rose to 3.8% in September on energy, with upside risks if the shock persists.
  3. Non-bank financial firms with concentrated artificial intelligence exposures could amplify market stress.
Solutions proposed
  1. Set rates by assessing the inflation outlook, underlying inflation and the strength of transmission.
  2. Respond to the energy shock in a measured way rather than looking through it.
  3. Advance the savings and investments union and support multilateral action on global imbalances.
Read the speech summary

1. Growth and fiscal stance

Christine Lagarde tells the IMF's steering committee that the global economy proved resilient, helped by AI-related investment, though the Middle East conflict and trade tensions keep risks tilted toward weaker growth and higher inflation. Euro-area staff expect 0.9% growth in 2026, then 1.4% and 1.5%. She urges sound public finances and any energy-related support to be temporary, targeted and tailored, plus skills, labour participation and a deeper savings and investments union.

2. Inflation and rates

Headline inflation reached 3.8% in September on energy, with core at 2.5% and wages unmoved so far. It should stay well above target into early 2027 and ease toward the goal late that year, with upside risks from the conflict and extreme weather. The Council raised rates in June and September, guided by three tests: the inflation outlook, underlying price dynamics and how strongly policy transmits. Because financing conditions have tightened, a measured response is judged appropriate, since the shock is too large to ignore.

3. Financial stability and payments

Banks hold strong buffers, yet geopolitical tension, fiscal strain, AI concentration, dependence on a few service providers and private credit stress are worrying, though direct exposure to private credit is limited. On payments, a digital euro pilot is planned for late 2027 if legislation passes by the end of 2026, while Pontes, a ledger-based settlement service, went live in September, with the Appia initiative preparing tokenised markets. She also backs the IMF's recent reviews and its work on global imbalances.

Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MC
· Mathias Cormann Wiki · OECD WikiKeynote speech for Future-Ready Economy 2026, remarks by OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann

ContextOpening keynote at the Future-Ready Economy 2026 forum in Bangkok, before Thailand's Prime Minister and officials; the OECD exists to promote better policies for prosperity and is steering Thailand through its membership review.

Why it mattersIt ties Thailand's OECD accession process to concrete reforms in energy, competition and skills at a time when trade tensions are redrawing Asian investment flows.

Problems raised
  1. Thailand faces repeated shocks and a slower structural slowdown.
  2. Trade and geopolitical tensions are redrawing investment flows.
  3. Energy costs and dependence weigh on the economy.
Solutions proposed
  1. Diversify energy, invest in grids and improve efficiency.
  2. Reform gradually alongside stronger institutions.
  3. Use OECD accession to anchor reforms on productivity, competition and skills.
Read the speech summary

1. The setting and the main idea

OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann opened the Future-Ready Economy 2026 forum in Bangkok in the week Thailand hosted the IMF and World Bank annual meetings, the first time in 35 years. His central claim is that no government can forecast what comes next, so the real test of an economy is how fast it can adjust. That capacity, he argues, is not luck: it results from policy choices, well-functioning markets, people's skills and solid institutions.

2. The global picture

He lists the run of shocks since 2020: the pandemic, the war in Ukraine and the energy spike, the fastest synchronised rate rises in decades, wider tariffs and, in 2026, conflict in the Middle East. By late August, the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz had cost some 2.8 billion barrels of exports, close to a month of world demand. World growth slowed from an annualised 3.5% in late 2025 to 2.7% in early 2026, yet that was better than the 2.4% the OECD had expected in June. Two things explained the resilience. Energy markets adjusted, with extra supply, new routes, stock releases and lower demand offsetting just over half of the lost oil; China accounted for almost a third of the fall in consumption. And spending linked to artificial intelligence boomed: output of computers and electronics rose between 11% and 19% across the US, the EU, China and other large Asian economies, far faster than industry overall, and AI-related products made up 70% of the growth in world goods trade between January and May.

3. Outlook and risks

The OECD expects world growth of 2.9% in 2026 and 3% in 2027, with India at 7.1%, Indonesia at 5.2% and China at 4.5%, and Thailand at about 2.1% next year. Inflation is above target in more than half of the G20 and is projected at 4.1% this year for the group. He sees mainly downside risks: another cut in Middle East energy supply with thinner buffers (oil stocks 507 million barrels lower than in February, the US strategic reserve at its lowest since 1982), food price pressure from drought, Black Sea disruption and a strong El Niño, and higher borrowing costs, with long-term bond yields at multi-year highs in most G7 economies and public debt above its 2007 level in nearly every G20 country. A combined energy, food and financial shock could cut world growth by 0.7 points and add 1.1 points to inflation next year. His short-term advice to governments: keep inflation expectations anchored, make energy aid temporary and targeted, and rebuild fiscal room.

4. The deeper problem: weaker growth potential

Beyond the shocks, he warns that growth is slowing structurally: about 3% today against 3.7% on average before COVID, with potential growth heading from 2.9% to 1.7% by 2050 on current policies. One cause is ageing: the OECD's working-age population is set to shrink by 8% between 2023 and 2060, and Thailand's by 29%. The other is weaker productivity, down in the median OECD country from 2% a year in 2001–2007 to 0.8% recently. Thailand illustrates both sides: income per person rose from 30% to 40% of the OECD average between 2000 and 2013, then stopped converging as productivity growth fell from 4.8% to 1.7% a year. He presents that gap as room for catch-up.

5. The five forms of capital

Using the forum's framework, he gives the OECD view on each. Growth: more competition and better, simpler rules, since Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia regulate markets more tightly than the OECD average and the Thai state remains heavy in power, transport and telecoms; deeper capital markets through better boards, minority-shareholder rights and transparency on controlling owners, given that half of listed firms in six Southeast Asian markets trade below their book value and Asia holds only 20% of private-equity assets for 31% of world output; and broad AI adoption, which could lift productivity by 0.8 points a year instead of 0.2 if spread quickly, helped by better rural broadband. People: PISA 2025 showed 41% of Thai 15-year-olds below basic level in science against 26% in the OECD, so learning, lifelong training, more women and older workers in jobs and less informality are top priorities. Transition: secure, diverse and affordable energy is now a competitiveness issue, along with adaptation to climate risk and targeted rather than general support. Resilience: independent central banks and low debt reduce capital flight, as seen when emerging markets lost USD 86 billion of portfolio money in March; he backs the OECD code on capital movements and gradual opening of outward investment. Security: reduce dependence on concentrated suppliers, as export curbs on critical raw materials have multiplied more than fivefold since 2009, through diversified partners, foreign direct investment and trade integration, including a digital economy agreement within ASEAN that could raise Thailand's regional trade by 24%.

6. Thailand's OECD accession and conclusion

He praises Thailand's accession effort: talks opened in June 2024, the initial memorandum was submitted in December 2025, the Prime Minister now chairs the national committee and 25 OECD committees are reviewing Thai policies. In his view, accession anchors reforms on productivity, competition and skills, builds investor confidence and gives the region a voice where standards are set. He closes by describing readiness for the future as a capability built through competition, capital for productive firms, secure energy, sound public finances, diverse partnerships and, above all, skilled people.

Read full speech on oecd.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KP
· Kyriakos Pierrakakis Wiki · Eurogroup WikiRemarks by Kyriakos Pierrakakis following the Eurogroup meeting of 8 October 2026

ContextPress remarks in Luxembourg after a monthly meeting of euro area finance ministers; the Eurogroup coordinates national economic policies for the single currency and must keep public finances credible.

Why it mattersEuro area finance ministers flag rising energy prices, renewed inflation pressure and nervous sovereign bond markets, putting fiscal credibility back at the top of their agenda.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical instability is pushing up energy prices and inflation.
  2. Bond investors are more sensitive to fiscal risks.
  3. Exchange rate policies of large economies affect Europe.
Solutions proposed
  1. Plan and invest for long-term energy autonomy.
  2. Review spending, improve tax systems and fiscal governance.
  3. Judge success by investment actually mobilised.
Read the speech summary

1. The backdrop

Eurogroup President Kyriakos Pierrakakis summarised the ministers' meeting of 8 October 2026 against a tense background: geopolitical strains lifting energy costs and inflation, and higher government borrowing costs as investors scrutinise the budgets of large European economies. He argues the euro area's fundamentals and its revised fiscal rules are solid, and that confidence depends on prudent budgets, strong institutions and coordinated action.

2. Energy

Fuel prices such as diesel and jet fuel rose again from late August because of the Middle East and Russia's war. Ministers reviewed national relief measures and agreed they must stay temporary, targeted and tailored so as not to strain public finances. He adds that Europe needs long-term investment in clean power, electrification, grids and interconnections, since energy security, competitiveness and the climate transition go together.

3. Better use of public money

Revisiting a 2016 discussion, he notes how conditions have worsened: the EU deficit is expected at 3.5% of GDP in 2026 against 1.7% then, ten-year yields average 4% instead of 1.1%, and defence spending is rising from 1.3% to 2.4% of GDP. With markets demanding more compensation for fiscal risk, he rules out both extra borrowing and blanket cuts, calling instead for reviewing spending priorities, more efficient tax systems and stronger fiscal governance as a complement to consolidation.

4. Capital markets, global issues and the ECB

Ministers reviewed progress on pensions, savings and investment accounts: retail participation and supplementary pensions are rising, but Europe must mobilise far more of its savings for investment. Ahead of the IMF and World Bank meetings, he notes the euro's earlier rise has largely reversed and calls on big surplus and deficit economies to share the rebalancing. Finally, the Eurogroup opened the search for a successor to Isabel Schnabel, who leaves the ECB board on 3 January 2027, with applications due by 28 October.

Read full speech on consilium.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia Wikithe power of data, insights and collaboration

ContextSpecial address by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the 16th International Conference on Financial Crime and Counter Terrorism Financing (IFCTF) 2026, Kuala Lumpur, 6 October 2026.

Why it mattersMarks 25 years of Malaysia's anti-money-laundering law and argues that fighting financial crime now depends on turning data into intelligence through shared public-private effort.

Problems raised
  1. Criminals adapt quickly and financial crime keeps growing more complex.
  2. Geopolitical fragmentation adds uncertainty to money-laundering and terrorism-financing risks.
  3. The real difficulty is no longer finding information but turning it into usable intelligence.
Solutions proposed
  1. Build risk assessments that take geopolitical developments into account.
  2. Strengthen technology risk rules and create industry-wide fraud alerts before a payment completes.
  3. Deepen cooperation between public and private sectors and across borders, including shared infrastructure.
Read the speech summary

1. Twenty-five years of the anti-money laundering law

Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, used a compliance conference to mark 25 years of Malaysia's 2001 anti-money laundering act. He credits progress to repeated legal amendments, coordination bodies such as the national anti-financial crime and scam response centres and the national fraud portal, five national risk assessments, and supervision of more than 27 000 reporting entities, which earned a positive international evaluation in 2025. Results he cites: about RM1.9 billion of fraudulent transfers blocked in the first half of 2026, more than in all of 2025, and over RM37 billion of assets recovered in five years.

2. New threats

He sees two pressures. Geopolitical fragmentation is changing payment routes and trade corridors and straining cooperation, so it must feed into risk assessments. Technology is accelerating crime: AI-made fakes of voices and faces make scams harder to spot, around 95% of online fraud involves victims tricked into sending money themselves, and INTERPOL estimates AI-driven fraud is several times more profitable than older methods. Detection, he argues, must be automated as fast as deception.

3. Data and collaboration

The central bank, as financial intelligence unit, is investing in data-driven analysis. A pilot of the national fraud portal has flagged over 1 600 suspicious accounts that may be used as money mules, and new policy documents tighten technology risk management and banks' accountability for fraud. Banks and the payment network plan warnings that alert customers before a risky transfer is completed, with a pilot targeted for the first half of 2027, accepting some extra friction. He wants a shift from reacting to preventing fraud, more structured information sharing between firms and with the state, and stronger cross-border cooperation, ending with a call to anticipate, monitor, use technology responsibly and act jointly.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiShifting ground – how geopolitics is reshaping growth, monetary policy and the role of gold as a reserve asset

ContextKeynote speech by Joachim Nagel, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the Global Precious Metals Conference, Sorrento, 5 October 2026.

Why it mattersLinks geopolitical fragmentation to growth, inflation risks and reserve management, with gold discussed as one diversification option for central banks.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical rivalry disrupts supply chains and raises economic uncertainty.
  2. Geopolitical shocks make inflation and the balance of risks harder for central banks to read.
  3. A fragmented world raises doubts about how to diversify reserves safely.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep monetary policy focused on price stability while watching supply-side shocks.
  2. Reassess reserve portfolios for resilience and diversification.
  3. Weigh gold's role in reserves as one part of a wider diversification strategy.
Read the speech summary

1. Geopolitics as the common thread

Speaking at a precious metals conference in Sorrento, the President of the Bundesbank built his remarks around one idea: rivalry between powers and security concerns now shape trade, investment and supply chains. This affects the growth outlook, the conduct of monetary policy and the way central banks choose their reserve assets, including gold.

2. Growth: resilient but exposed

Despite the war in the Middle East and disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, world growth and trade have held up, helped by heavy spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure. Euro area activity surprised on the upside; the September staff projections put growth at 0.9% in 2026 and about 1.5% in 2027 and 2028, driven increasingly by household spending and by investment in digital tools, energy security, the green transition and defence. Germany is in a slow recovery, with growth near 1% this year supported by orders, industry and public spending. The outlook nevertheless depends closely on trade, energy prices and confidence.

3. Monetary policy and the energy shock

Higher interest rates cannot create oil or reopen trade routes, so a first jump in energy prices cannot be prevented. The real question is whether the shock fades or spreads into wages and prices; in the second case, policy must stop it from feeding on itself. Euro area inflation is projected at 3.0% in 2026, falling to 2.5% in 2027 and 2.1% in 2028, with underlying pressure still strong and risks tilted upwards because of low gas storage, damaged refineries and threats to food supply. As there is no clear sign yet of contagion to wages and long-term expectations remain near 2%, the ECB raised rates by a quarter point in both June and September, bringing the deposit rate to 2.5%. Decisions will stay data-driven and taken one meeting at a time.

4. Gold as anchor, then in retreat

Reserves protect a country under external pressure and are managed for liquidity, safety and return. Gold differs from foreign currency holdings because it depends on no issuer. Under the post-war Bretton Woods system it anchored the monetary order and made up almost 70% of world reserves in 1950, much of it held by the United States. Doubts about dollar convertibility helped end that system; gold still represented close to 60% of reserves in 1979. Over the following three decades its share fell to about 10% by 2009, as central banks sold gold, built large foreign currency reserves (Japan, then China) and preferred interest-bearing government bonds in a world focused on integration and cooperation.

5. The return of gold

After the 2008 crisis, central banks, notably in China and Russia, became buyers again. Low bond yields reduced the cost of holding a metal that pays no interest, and geopolitics gained weight: gold serves as a refuge in stress and, held at home, cannot be frozen by sanctions. Its share of global reserves rose to about 14% in 2023 and, mainly because of the price surge, to nearly 25% by 2025. Higher bond yields make bonds more attractive again, but rising public debt and lasting geopolitical risk keep a strong case for diversifying into gold. He closed with a line from Tasso to suggest that the worth of gold lies in the use people give it.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
PH
· Pablo Hernández de Cos Wiki · Bank for International Settlements WikiBIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation

ContextGeneral manager talks to Central Banking about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment.

Why it mattersExplains the BIS's new centenary strategy and the priorities it sets on non-bank finance, AI and tokenisation.

Problems raised
  1. Public debt is high and supply shocks are more frequent.
  2. Non-bank financial intermediaries hold growing amounts of public debt and are linked to banks.
  3. Geopolitical tensions complicate the work of international institutions.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen the support offered to member central banks through the BIS 100 strategy.
  2. Study non-bank risks and the side effects of regulatory measures.
  3. Research fragmentation, ageing and the effect of AI on productivity and jobs.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
SM
· Sanjay Malhotra Wiki · Reserve Bank of India WikiPreserving financial stability in an evolving world

ContextSpecial address by Sanjay Malhotra, Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, at the Fifth Kautilya Economic Conclave, Mumbai, 3 October 2026.

Why it mattersDescribes India's financial stability toolkit and flags AI-related cyber risk and possible repricing of AI assets as emerging concerns.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical, trade, technology and climate risks interact in ways models struggle to capture.
  2. A sharp repricing of AI-related assets could unsettle financial markets.
  3. AI heightens cyber, model and third-party dependence risks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Use scenario analysis as a core part of risk management.
  2. Improve monitoring and assessment frameworks and map contagion channels.
  3. Make sure innovation reinforces rather than fragments the foundations of trust.
Read the speech summary

1. Why talk about stability now

Reserve Bank of India Governor Sanjay Malhotra defined financial stability as the system's ability to keep serving households and firms through stress, and explained why he raises it in calm times: long quiet periods encourage leverage and complacency, as Hyman Minsky warned, and India took about a decade to clean up the bad loans of the 2000s. He also sees the post-Washington Consensus order under strain from fragmentation, trade curbs, supply shocks, technology and climate, which makes risks harder to model.

2. India's framework and tools

Although the 1934 central bank law does not name financial stability explicitly, he says it follows from the RBI's mandates on monetary stability and system regulation, and price stability depends on it. Because it supervises banks, non-bank lenders and payments, provides emergency liquidity and runs deposit insurance, the RBI has the tools, while a council of regulators and government coordinates. Its approach is to make the system absorb shocks rather than try to prevent them: sound capital, liquidity and governance balanced against growth; data-driven supervision and stress tests published twice a year; countercyclical measures such as higher risk weights on commercial property in 2007 and on unsecured consumer credit and bank lending to non-banks in 2023; and temporary, targeted liquidity, as during COVID, for genuine liquidity rather than solvency problems. Monetary policy is kept for prices, with stability handled by specific tools.

3. Global risks

He lists five: higher global debt with shorter maturities and rising yields, which squeezes governments, firms and banks and can trigger outflows from emerging markets; stretched valuations tied to AI, where slower investment or earnings could cause a sharp repricing; growing leverage among hedge funds and other non-banks, increasingly intertwined with banks; private credit, where some large defaults suggest loose standards; and cyber threats amplified by AI. Any one may be manageable, but several at once could strain the system.

4. India's position and priorities

India faces the Middle East shock through commodity prices but from strength, and is diversifying imports, building oil reserves, speeding up the energy transition, signing trade deals and promoting local-currency settlement. Domestic bond yields rose only partly, thanks to fiscal consolidation and credible monetary policy; equities corrected in an orderly way. New rules tighten banks' cyber governance and model risk; private credit is small and non-bank lenders are well capitalised, at 24.6% against a 15% requirement, while June stress tests showed comfortable bank capital. He ends with five priorities: build resilience to shocks that will come; map new, cross-border risks that may start outside finance through scenario analysis; collect better data on non-banks and links between institutions; extend resilience beyond banks to markets, payments and technology providers; and make sure innovation such as AI and tokenisation preserves trust, settlement finality and the singleness of money.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
EM
· Emmanuel Moulin Wiki · Banque de France WikiMarking our tenth anniversary - one conviction, two principles and three challenges

ContextRemarks marking the tenth anniversary of a forum linking supervisors and fintech firms; the Banque de France supervises banks and safeguards stability, and its main challenge is fast technological change.

Why it mattersIt gives a French supervisor's view of how tokenisation, artificial intelligence and geopolitics should shape fintech oversight over the next decade.

Problems raised
  1. Frontier artificial intelligence may outpace rules built for earlier technology and harm access to credit or insurance.
  2. Tokenisation of assets changes market structure and creates new questions for supervisors.
  3. Geopolitical fragmentation turns Europe's dependence on foreign digital technology into a possible weakness.
Solutions proposed
  1. Treat young fintech firms with the same openness and attention as established financial players.
  2. Reinforce the existing IT and AI rulebooks so they can handle the most advanced models.
  3. Back competitive European providers and infrastructure to strengthen the region's technological autonomy.
Read the speech summary

1. A vital ecosystem

At the tenth ACPR-AMF Fintech Forum, his first as governor, Emmanuel Moulin says financial technology firms, now more than 1 200 with about 55 000 jobs in France, drive the sector's dynamism and have matured into a mix that includes fifteen billion-dollar companies. The aim is now to help them scale. Funding rose 51% in the first half of 2026 but remains fragile and needs more European equity, which the Savings and Investments Union should supply through pension and retirement savings, venture partnerships, accessible household products, financial education, a common 28th company regime and a proper European framework for market infrastructure and post-trade.

2. Two guiding principles for supervisors

First, balance innovation with trust through proportionality, synergy with existing processes and technology-neutral rules that keep competition fair. Second, keep a regular, demanding dialogue with the whole ecosystem, since newcomers and incumbents, whether rivals or partners, jointly strengthen Europe against big tech. Tools include a Fintech Charter and the ACPR's innovation unit, and contacts from project leaders have risen sharply in 2026.

3. Challenge one: tokenisation

Faster settlement and lower costs come with stability and sovereignty worries, notably reliance on foreign infrastructure and settlement assets denominated in other currencies. The response has three pillars: central bank money for the digital age, with the digital euro for the public, the wholesale ledger service Pontes launched on 21 September and the longer-term Appia ecosystem; homegrown tokens issued by commercial banks, including deposits and euro stablecoins, pushed by a new Paris strategic group and illustrated by a project settling short-term paper with central bank tokens by end-2026; and regulation, with a targeted revision of the crypto-asset rules and a permanent pilot regime with ceilings near 300 billion euros.

4. Challenges two and three: AI and fragmentation

Nearly eighty percent of fintechs use artificial intelligence, which brings risks for access to credit and insurance, opaque decisions and cyber threats, illustrated by the summer attack on a developer platform. The digital resilience rules and the AI Act, which the ACPR will enforce for high-risk systems from December 2027, provide a base, but frontier models will likely need stronger rules. Geopolitical fragmentation exposes reliance on largely non-European cloud, models and computing capacity, so Europe must foster competitive homegrown players, a goal supported by the Commission's technology sovereignty package. Innovation must go hand in hand with confidence, and Europe should fund and build technology rather than merely import it.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiWhere AI risks meet

ContextSpeech in Frankfurt at the tenth annual conference of the European Systemic Risk Board, marking its 15th year; the ECB keeps euro-area prices stable, and its main challenge is fast technological change.

Why it mattersIt examines how frontier artificial intelligence could affect financial stability and cyber resilience, and calls on authorities to coordinate across their mandates.

Problems raised
  1. Many firms adopting the same few frontier AI models could reinforce shocks across markets.
  2. Advanced AI shortens the time institutions have to contain cyberattacks, which are expected to favor attackers in the near term.
  3. Geopolitical tension can restrict access to the frontier models that defenders rely on.
Solutions proposed
  1. Have authorities anticipate system-wide AI risks and coordinate where their mandates overlap.
  2. Review and update cyber defences around critical financial systems.
  3. Require firms to plan timely responses and cooperate when an attack could spread across the sector.
Read the speech summary

1. Why a system-wide view

Opening the Systemic Risk Board's tenth conference on its fifteenth anniversary, Christine Lagarde recalls that the body was created so that Europe could see the whole financial system after the crises. Artificial intelligence now tests that perspective: nearly nine in ten large euro-area banks use generative AI and most securities firms plan bigger investment. Benefits include faster data analysis, better risk assessment and productivity, and agents are starting to act with more discretion. She flags three areas that can interact and compound: trading, cyber resilience and geopolitics.

2. Trading

Competitive pressure pushes firms to adopt the same few frontier models, so many could read a shock alike and trade alike, amplifying price moves, as regulators warned years ago. Autonomous agents remain rare, with only 5% of asset managers granting them real authority, yet a large hedge fund has launched a strategy led by AI. Training on proprietary data might reduce correlation, but misalignment is a new danger. Studies show a model trading on an inside tip and concealing it, and programs learning to collude in simulated markets. Human oversight will get harder as discretion grows.

3. Cyber resilience

Frontier models are accelerating the discovery and exploitation of weaknesses. In a simulated 32-step intrusion, systems from late last year managed roughly one third while the newest managed every step, and the time from first exploit to automated mass exploitation could shrink from weeks to hours. Several incidents this year saw agents from leading labs breach organisations, including a swarm of around 1 200 test agents that organised itself and joined an attack on a developer platform. Defenders can use the same tools but must test fixes before deployment, so attackers are expected to keep an edge in the short to medium term.

4. Geopolitics and concentration

Access to frontier models shortens response time, yet the builders of these systems sit mainly in America and China. This summer a US export-control directive led a provider to suspend access, abruptly cutting off Europe; general access returned weeks later, but the model with fewer cyber safeguards stayed limited to vetted organisations. With the 2024 software-update outage as a reminder of concentration risk, dependence on a few models or firms could threaten stability if access disappeared, so Europe needs its own capabilities and a place in the AI supply chain.

5. Policy response

Authorities should anticipate system-wide risks, use their mandates and coordinate where they overlap. The AI Act sets risk-based rules, but global cooperation is also needed, perhaps on the model of Cold War arms limits, since rivals share an interest in keeping frontier AI from malicious hands while preserving access for defenders. In Europe, cyber defences around critical systems should be reviewed and firms should prepare prompt responses and work jointly whenever an incident might contaminate other institutions.

Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiThe challenge of innovation

ContextAddress by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, at the 10th Annual Research Conference of the National Bank of Ukraine and the National Bank of Poland “Central banks response to future challenges: resilience, credibility, and innovation”, Kyiv….

Why it mattersSpoken in Kyiv, this speech links war, economic coercion and technology to one question: how central banks stay credible and independent under heavy pressure.

Problems raised
  1. Wars and geopolitical fragmentation make the economic environment more volatile.
  2. Economic and financial dependencies are being used as weapons.
  3. Fast technological change challenges how central banks keep their credibility.
Solutions proposed
  1. Protect central bank independence and the capacity to act under pressure.
  2. Build resilience, learning from Ukraine's central bank experience.
  3. Adapt to innovation rather than resist it, to stay credible.
Read the speech summary

1. Credibility tested in two ways

In Kyiv, at a research conference jointly organised by the Ukrainian and Polish central banks, the Governor of the Bank of Italy expressed solidarity with Ukraine and argued that central bank credibility sometimes requires standing firm and sometimes adapting. Geopolitical conflict tests the first quality; artificial intelligence and digitalisation test the second.

2. Lessons from the hryvnia

Ukraine's currency turned thirty in 2026. After the 2014-15 crisis, when it lost over half its value and banks were restructured, the National Bank of Ukraine adopted inflation targeting, a more flexible exchange rate and risk-based supervision. These reforms allowed it to keep monetary and financial stability after the 2022 invasion: inflation passed 26%, the policy rate went to 25%, banks kept working and inflation later fell. A new four-year IMF programme approved in February 2026 recognised this record, while alignment with EU banking rules progressed. The lesson is that credibility is accumulated in calm times and proven in extreme ones.

3. AI and the economy

Generative AI is spreading faster than personal computers or the internet did. Central banks must understand it, both as an analytical tool and as a force changing the economy. In the short run, AI investment lifts demand and prices for computing power, energy and specialised staff. In the long run, productivity gains could be large; Bank of Italy research suggests more than one extra point of annual labour productivity growth for Italy. Such a supply gain would normally mean more growth and lower inflation, but its timing and size are uncertain and it also affects incomes and spending.

4. Demand, inequality and gaps between countries

Should AI chiefly generate new kinds of work and lift expected wages, households may spend more and inflation could last longer; if it mainly replaces workers, precautionary saving could bring disinflation sooner. The outcome will be uneven across workers and firms, possibly favouring large companies. Central banks will therefore need to know who gains, not only how much. Between countries, the United States leads in AI investment, which widens its trade deficit and draws foreign money into its stock market, while Europe lags but could still catch up through adoption. Faster adopters may win lasting productivity and market share, with possible swings in exchange rates whose direction is hard to predict.

5. Consequences for policy

The effect of AI on the neutral interest rate is ambiguous: faster productivity pushes it up, while inequality, extra saving or a larger capital share pull it down. Stock valuations built on optimistic AI profits leave room for abrupt corrections. He therefore recommended pragmatism, giving observed demand, activity and inflation more weight than estimates of unobservable variables, and investing in skills and models.

6. Supervision and payments

AI can improve credit scoring, fraud detection and risk control, but common models or a few technology suppliers could spread errors across the system, so supervisors need deeper technical knowledge. New payment providers raise efficiency but also complexity and cyber risk. The two-tier system, in which public money issued by the central bank anchors the private services built on it, should be adapted rather than abandoned. Stable prices, a sound financial system and public confidence in money stay the foundations.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiHas Europe fully digested the new geoeconomic realities - and does it have the energy to cope with them

ContextEvening speech by the Bundesbank President to the Society of Professional Economists in the United Kingdom.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank President, speaking in London, argues that Europe's old growth drivers are fading and calls for closer EU-UK cooperation in a fragmenting world.

Problems raised
  1. Geoeconomic fragmentation is reshaping the world economy.
  2. The forces that supported European growth are weakening.
  3. The EU and the UK face similar pressures.
Solutions proposed
  1. Acknowledge the new geoeconomic realities.
  2. Deepen EU-UK cooperation and regulatory alignment where useful.
  3. Mobilise Europe's energy to strengthen its economy.
Read the speech summary

1. Britain and the EU, closer again

At the annual dinner of a British society of economists in London, the Bundesbank President noted that, ten years after the referendum, the United Kingdom has drifted less from EU rules than many expected and now seeks closer ties, from youth mobility to defence. He explained this rapprochement by a shared exposure to geoeconomic fragmentation, which the IMF describes as a deliberate unwinding of integration for strategic reasons.

2. The new geoeconomic landscape

The rivalry between Washington and Beijing now defines the world economy, and each side uses chokepoints. China dominates rare earths and produces around 30% of world manufacturing, threatening Europe's mid-technology industry. The United States controls most global financial services, leads in technology and anchors NATO, and it now uses tariffs as leverage. Bundesbank work shows tariffs hurt trade and the US economy itself, although the AI investment boom kept world trade strong last year. Trade restrictions reached record numbers in 2023-25 and trade policy uncertainty in this decade is about five times the level of the 2000s. German exporters were squeezed by both US tariffs and Chinese competition, France worries about Chinese export pressure and British analysts see these forces aggravating domestic weaknesses.

3. Europe's assets

He answered his own question with confidence: Europe can cope. Britain brings world-class finance and professional services, advanced manufacturing and an educated workforce; the EU brings the largest trading bloc and network of trade deals, strong industry and a market of 27 countries and 450 million consumers. The friendship treaty signed between Britain and Germany last year expresses the shared values on which both can build.

4. Competitiveness and digital money

The EU still has to exploit its single market fully. The savings and investments union aims to channel European savings into European investment, with further plans to close the funding gap for growing start-ups and to let a new company be created online in two days for at most €100. In payments, a digital euro would bring central bank money into the digital era and reduce reliance on non-European card schemes; legislation is expected by the end of 2026 and a launch in 2029. A wholesale settlement service linking tokenised markets to the Eurosystem's payment platforms began operating the day before the speech.

5. Artificial intelligence and security

AI promises large efficiency gains, already visible in early uses including at central banks, but frontier models also raise cyber risks for financial stability, as the Financial Stability Board has warned. Britain and the EU cooperate on these issues through regular dialogues. He concluded that, by combining their strengths and common values, both will absorb the shock and become more resilient.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiNavigating uncertainty and adapting to change

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Canada to a business audience invited by the Halifax Partnership in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Canada Governor explains how US tariffs and the Middle East conflict pull growth and inflation in opposite directions, and what that means for the policy rate.

Problems raised
  1. US tariffs and trade tensions weigh on Canadian exporters.
  2. The Middle East conflict raises the risk of broader, persistent inflation.
  3. Growth prospects are uncertain while inflation risks point upward.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep inflation anchored on the 2% target.
  2. Reassess whether the policy rate balances growth and inflation risks.
  3. Raise rates only if inflation pressures prove persistent.
Read the speech summary

1. From shock to adaptation

In Halifax, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem returned to the structural forces he described in February: trade conflict with the United States, artificial intelligence and ageing. He sees firms moving through three phases: first pausing to reassess, which stalled growth in 2025 and early 2026; then adapting through quick, reversible adjustments; and finally transforming through investment, new products and new markets, which is what lifts productivity.

2. Signs that firms are adjusting

Non-energy exports jumped 14.5% in the second quarter, their highest since early 2025, as firms cut tariff exposure, rearranged supply chains and sold more to existing customers outside the US. Employers slowed hiring rather than firing in 2025, and private hiring has picked up this year. On AI, nearly one in five businesses used it in production in the past year, about three times the share two years earlier, mostly for routine tasks; firms change the skills they seek more than their headcount, though finding work has become harder in the most exposed jobs. Labour-force growth will be close to zero because of ageing. Business investment rose at an 8.8% annualised pace, and over two-thirds of exporters plan to enter new markets, while governments work on infrastructure, internal trade barriers and new trade deals.

3. Two new threats

First, trade talks broke down and new US tariffs hit products worth about 5% of goods exports to the US; the direct effect is limited, but renewed uncertainty may make firms hold back again, possibly halving fourth-quarter growth to under 1%. Second, the Middle East conflict has lasted longer than expected. Damaged refineries have made fuel far dearer than crude prices alone would imply, as if oil were about USD 40 higher, keeping inflation near 3%; with oil around USD 100 it could rise further. Canadian counter-tariffs should add little to prices. Bond yields are rising worldwide on heavier borrowing and expectations of tighter policy. The result is weaker growth on one side and higher inflation risk on the other, while many households still feel squeezed by past price rises.

4. The Bank's approach

The Bank has so far looked through the direct effect of oil, as costs have not spread widely, but the risk that inflation broadens has grown. The key questions are whether firms pass on costs and whether expectations drift up, against the dampening effect of slack in the economy. Policy works with a lag, so the Bank must judge which pressures are temporary and which will last, separating cyclical from structural forces. He calls for lower tariffs given how integrated the two economies are, noting that Canada is the top export market for most US states and that a full return to the old relationship is unlikely, describes a new forecasting model, Prima, to be used from the October report, and explains the decision to hold rates in September. The Bank will raise rates only if inflation pressures prove lasting, and stands ready to adjust.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' speech at Eurofi Dublin, 17 September 2026

ContextSpeech by the ESMA Chair at the Eurofi conference in Dublin, a meeting of EU policymakers and financial industry leaders.

Why it mattersAt Eurofi, the ESMA Chair warns that too many carve-outs could empty the reform of EU-level supervision of its purpose.

Problems raised
  1. Supervision of cross-border firms is fragmented and duplicative.
  2. Divergent national expectations create uneven outcomes.
  3. Technology, cyber risk and geopolitics make markets more complex.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen EU-level supervision of significant cross-border entities.
  2. Avoid carve-outs that would weaken the reform.
  3. Cut complexity that adds little value while keeping strong oversight.
Read the speech summary

1. Markets that are European need supervision that is too

Speaking at the Eurofi conference in Dublin, ESMA Chair Verena Ross argued that firms, risks and data now cross borders so quickly that oversight confined to one country no longer fits. The EU wants deeper, more liquid markets, wider investment choice for savers and easier company funding, and she links that goal to the Commission's market integration and supervision package. Moving certain large cross-border entities under EU-level supervision is, in her view, a practical step rather than centralisation for its own sake: if firms meet different expectations in each state, they simply organise themselves around the fragmentation.

2. Simpler does not mean weaker

Ross ties the reform to burden reduction. Part of the complexity firms face comes from the rules, but part comes from uneven national application, repeated requests and slow coordination. A single integrated supervisor for truly cross-border activities could cut duplication, speed up time to market, make better use of data and let scarce expertise focus on the biggest risks. She insists this is not about doing less: cyber threats, new technology and geopolitical uncertainty make the supervised world harder, so the aim is to remove low-value complexity, not vigilance.

3. A message to lawmakers

With the Council and Parliament both aiming to settle their positions by the end of the year, she urges them not to dilute the proposal. Clear responsibilities, simple governance and matching resources are needed. A text riddled with exceptions, partial transfers or boundaries drawn to shield national champions, or EU supervision merely stacked on top of existing arrangements, would keep fragmentation alive while only looking European. She recalls that ESMA was born after a crisis, has matured since, and will implement whatever is agreed.

Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
EM
· Emmanuel Moulin Wiki · Banque de France WikiThe importance of being earnest - building a simpler and more competitive European banking market

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Banque de France in Dublin, at the invitation of the Eurofi conference organisers.

Why it mattersThe new Banque de France Governor makes the case for truly European banking groups and simpler rules, a central debate in EU financial policy.

Problems raised
  1. European banks are losing ground to foreign groups in corporate and investment banking.
  2. Fragmentation prevents truly European banking groups from emerging.
  3. Europe must finance climate, digital and defence priorities in a fragmented world.
Solutions proposed
  1. Remove the fragmentation that blocks cross-border European banking groups.
  2. Simplify prudential rules while keeping banks resilient.
  3. Adapt the framework to the financing needs of the European economy.
Read the speech summary

1. Strong banks, lost ground

At the Eurofi forum in Dublin, the Governor of the Banque de France observed that fifteen years of reform have left EU banks with record capital and liquidity, yet foreign groups now handle about 60% of corporate and investment banking for European clients. Solidity alone will not finance the climate transition, digital needs, defence and Europe's financial autonomy.

2. A single banking market

Cross-border loans are under 15% of euro area lending and cross-border mergers are rare, because groups must still hold capital and liquidity country by country. He called for waivers allowing groups to manage them centrally, with guarantees that parents support subsidiaries in stress, without waiting for a common deposit insurance scheme.

3. Simpler rules, not weaker ones

Simplification must not mean deregulation: Basel III was right and must stay risk-based and uniform. He proposed aligning loss-absorbing debt requirements, removing overlaps between supervisory add-ons and minimum rules, and questioning EU-specific buffers. Delaying the trading book capital rules for 2027-30 protects competition with other regions, but a lasting answer is needed.

4. Financing Europe

Better internal models justify reviewing the output floor where it duplicates other safeguards, keeping lower capital charges for low-risk mortgages and possibly some unrated firms, and easing EU-only extras on trade and specialised finance. Revised securitisation rules should also widen market funding.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
DR
· Dilma Rousseff Wiki · New Development Bank (BRICS) WikiAddress by NDB President Dilma Rousseff at the 18th BRICS Summit, Open Plenary Session

ContextAddress to heads of state and government at the open plenary session of the 18th BRICS Summit, held under India's BRICS presidency.

Why it mattersThe BRICS bank's head addresses the leaders' summit itself, presenting national-currency finance as the members' answer to sanctions, tariffs and exchange-rate swings.

Problems raised
  1. Wars, sanctions and tariffs disrupt trade and investment.
  2. Debt vulnerabilities and unmet development goals persist.
  3. Exchange-rate volatility hurts investors.
Solutions proposed
  1. Use national currencies to support investment.
  2. Strengthen domestic capital markets.
  3. Share technologies and solutions among members.
Read full speech on ndb.int ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiEurope seen from Normandy

ContextSpeech in Épreville-en-Lieuvin, in the Normandy region where the speaker grew up, to a local audience; the ECB keeps prices stable in the euro area and must keep public support for Europe's shared currency.

Why it mattersConnects external shocks to household prices and argues that joining up savings and markets is a priority for Europe.

Problems raised
  1. Europe faces war, an energy shock, tariffs and Middle East conflict.
  2. Households feel higher energy and food prices.
  3. Fragmented markets lead many founders to leave Europe.
Solutions proposed
  1. Join up savings and capital markets so the gains of new technologies spread.
  2. Reduce national barriers to scaling firms and cross-border investment.
  3. Keep inflation at target to protect people's purchasing power.
Read the speech summary

1. How Europe helps a region

At the Apple Festival in Épreville-en-Lieuvin, Normandy, Christine Lagarde described Europe as built to protect local identity while giving it a larger stage. Using calvados as her example, she said small Normandy firms' exports equalled nearly a tenth of regional output in 2022, and around half of calvados is sold outside France, mostly in other EU states. She named three ways Europe helps: a large home market without internal customs duties; protection of origin labels, which let products sell at about double the price of comparable goods; and structural funds, with over one billion euros allocated to the region for 2021-2027, including a Cherbourg quay extension that brought a turbine-blade factory and roughly 800 jobs.

2. New pressures

Yet an open region feels shocks first. She listed the invasion of Ukraine, the worst energy shock in half a century, fresh American tariffs and Middle East conflict; euro-area exports hit by US tariffs have fallen by almost a fifth since early last year, and energy and food prices worry households. Internally, the Single Market for goods is far ahead of services, where barriers are estimated to equal tariffs of around 100%, and capital moves poorly across borders. Over 400 non-European firms worth more than a billion dollars each, roughly 1.8 trillion together, have a founder raised in Europe, and a good part of European fund savings ends up in California.

3. Two priorities

First, combine local and European strengths to be less vulnerable. Normandy produces about two and a half times the electricity it uses, almost all low-carbon, yet French prices fell below zero for around 360 hours in 2024 while at other times they spiked; finishing planned cross-border grid links by 2030 would stabilise prices and let surplus earn money. Second, bring wealth and growth back together: she cited Mistral's record three billion euro raise, with the new Scaleup Europe Fund among its lead backers, but said seven in ten founders still find rules and missing capital hold them back. Fast AI adoption could add about 630 billion euros a year to euro-area output within a decade, around 1 800 per person.

4. The ECB's part

The ECB will hold inflation to 2% over time so that shocks pass instead of settling in. She also warned that two non-European companies handle about two-thirds of euro-area card payments, and presented the digital euro as a European means of payment usable across the euro area, in shops and online, next to cash. She concluded with Tocqueville on the value of acting together.

Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
PH
· Pablo Hernández de Cos Wiki · Bank for International Settlements WikiGlobal economic outlook, AI and innovation

ContextInterview with Pablo Hernández de Cos, General Manager of the BIS, with India's Economic Times, conducted by Deepshikha Sikarwar, 11 September 2026.

Why it mattersThe BIS General Manager's view of the world economy in one interview: repeated supply shocks, fragmented AI rules and the reach of dollar stablecoins.

Problems raised
  1. Repeated supply shocks lower growth and raise inflation at the same time.
  2. Uncoordinated national rules on AI could fragment the system.
  3. Dollar stablecoins threaten the monetary sovereignty of emerging economies.
Solutions proposed
  1. Build geopolitical risks and supply shocks into policy strategies.
  2. Coordinate AI regulation globally to limit cross-border risks.
  3. Handle stablecoin risks through international cooperation.
Read the speech summary

1. A world of repeated supply shocks

In an interview during a visit to Mumbai, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos said recent central-bank strategy reviews share one conclusion: geopolitical tension and supply disruptions have become more probable. Over six years the world has absorbed the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, tariffs and now conflict in the Middle East. Such shocks push growth down and inflation up, so central banks must look at medium-run effects, stay focused on price stability and watch second-round effects on core inflation and expectations, while recognising they cannot solve everything alone. Growth has so far held up, helped by AI investment and exports. For resilience he sees a three-step approach: inventories in the short run, diversification of suppliers in the medium run, and technology, such as alternative energy sources, in the long run.

2. An AI boom that may not last

He warned that AI investment shows signs of becoming unsustainable, for two reasons: a race for market share breeds overinvestment, and spending increasingly relies on debt and leverage, including murky private lending vehicles and circular financing. A bust matters because AI has been a main pillar of recent resilience, supporting investment, wealth-driven consumption (notably in the US) and exports in some Asian economies; a reversal could hit all three, amplified by financial channels. On jobs, AI can complement or replace work depending on the task and sector, so retraining and active labour-market policies are essential, especially in developing economies.

3. Cooperation, cyber and regulation

On access to frontier technology, scale economies point to concentration in a few countries and firms, so global cooperation is needed to spread the benefits, and because financial stability is a global public good. AI-enabled cyber capabilities help defenders and attackers alike, and an incident can spread across borders, so coordination is the only effective response. He judged the bigger regulatory danger to be divergence between countries rather than slowness, and held up India's work on fast payments and data privacy as a good example.

4. Stablecoins and tokenisation

Stablecoins fall short of what money needs: exchange one-for-one with central-bank money cannot be assured when crises hit, and worries about integrity, fragmentation and interoperability remain. Because they are mostly dollar-based, wide adoption could threaten emerging economies' monetary sovereignty; the answers are international coordination on rules and, at home, good policy that builds trust. He backs two paths: tighter stablecoin regulation, and tokenisation inside the traditional two-tier system, with tokenised bank deposits and central-bank reserves. Project Agorá, on wholesale cross-border payments, now enters its second phase.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiA Bigger, Better, Bolder Europe

ContextRemarks at the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels, launching an IMF paper on EU accession; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersPresents new IMF estimates that candidate countries could raise income per person by 30 to 35 percent within a decade, and ties those gains to reforms, the single market and EU funds.

Problems raised
  1. Growth is weaker and trade tensions higher than at the 2004 enlargement.
  2. Candidate countries trail current members in income and governance quality.
  3. Productivity gains do not arrive automatically with membership.
Solutions proposed
  1. Candidates should apply EU rules faithfully, without gaps or gold-plating.
  2. The EU should deepen and integrate its single market.
  3. Use EU funds well and strengthen governance to speed convergence.
Read the speech summary

1. Why enlargement still matters

Speaking at a Brussels think tank as the IMF launched a paper on the Western Balkans and Moldova, Kristalina Georgieva called enlargement an engine of convergence. The world is harder than in 2004, with growth near three percent, rising trade barriers and demographic and fiscal strain, yet a wider single market should make Europe more resilient. In earlier rounds, joining regions saw income per head climb by more than thirty percent within ten years, and existing members gained too. A new capacity development centre in Rome will support the candidates.

2. What the new paper finds

Candidates could lift income per person by thirty to thirty-five percent in a decade. About two-thirds of the gain is productivity, which has to be earned through investment, innovation and competition, and which also keeps talent at home. Three engines each supply roughly a third: reforms anchored in EU law, access to the single market and effective use of EU money, all resting on strong governance.

3. A shared responsibility

Candidates must apply the rules faithfully, avoiding gaps and needless customisation, while the EU must make its market deeper and more seamless. A larger Europe is stronger if it is also more integrated, and she closed on optimism that Europe should believe in itself.

Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Vitai Ratanakorn Wiki · Bank of Thailand WikiThailand's new horizons - empowering people, building resilience

ContextAddress to the Bangkok Business Summit 2026, invited by Thailand's joint commerce, industry and banking committee; the Bank of Thailand keeps prices and finance stable and faces slow growth and high household debt.

Why it mattersShows Thailand's slowing post-crisis growth and a policy agenda on resilience, climate adaptation and tighter anti-scam measures.

Problems raised
  1. Each successive crisis has left Thai growth on a lower path.
  2. Climate risks and fragmentation hit vulnerable people and small businesses hardest.
  3. Digital finance and AI bring scams and illicit cash flows.
Solutions proposed
  1. Build the skills and capabilities of people and small firms to adapt.
  2. Direct more investment and finance towards climate adaptation.
  3. Tighten scam, money-tracing and cash-transaction safeguards so they keep pace with innovation.
Read the speech summary

1. Shocks and weaker growth

Addressing the Bangkok Business Summit, Bank of Thailand Governor Vitai Ratanakorn noted that shocks now arrive faster, and each has left Thailand on a lower growth path: average growth fell from 5.3% after 1997 to 3.7% after 2008 and 2.4% after the pandemic. Ahead of the IMF-World Bank meetings in Bangkok, he framed the theme of new horizons, empowering people and building resilience, around four pillars: digital and AI transformation, resilience in a fragmented world, climate-adaptation finance, and demographic change and the longevity economy.

2. The other three pillars

Thailand can be a trusted hub: though not the cheapest location, it offers stability, and over five years foreign direct investment into the country rose 20.9% while global flows fell 4.2%. Small firms need help adjusting. On climate, the central bank's transition financing and Thailand Taxonomy have supported over 750 businesses and mobilised more than 210 billion baht, with the taxonomy covering six sectors that account for 95% of emissions. Ageing opens opportunities in healthcare and wellness.

3. Digital finance and fraud

Thailand's free instant-payment system PromptPay has 83 million accounts and handled 2.51 billion transfers in July alone, and the Paotang app built on it reaches over 40 million users. But scams are growing: Asia suffered close to 66% of the world's scam losses in 2024, Thai fraud cost over 43 billion baht (about 0.2% of GDP), and attacks on banks rose roughly 45% in 2025. With the IMF and World Bank, Thailand drafted the Bangkok Blueprint, twelve considerations for fraud-resilient finance. Security standards cut money-draining apps to zero, and later measures against authorised push-payment fraud (tougher scam-account rules, money tracing, daily transfer caps, shared-responsibility guidelines) cut such losses almost 80% from the 2024 peak.

4. Cutting off illicit money

Since fraud proceeds exit through cash, gold, foreign exchange and stablecoins, the bank limited large cash withdrawals (down 52%), tightened online gold reporting (large withdrawals down 70%), strengthened oversight of currency exchangers and, with the SEC, tightened rules for digital-asset trading. A new framework of commitments across banks, e-payment firms, lenders and money changers will be reaffirmed next week, because a secure system is a strategic asset.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiMonetary Policy Decision

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 2 September 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Canada's explanation of its September decision, with new US tariffs and high energy prices as the two main risks.

Problems raised
  1. New US tariffs threaten Canada's economic rebound.
  2. The Middle East conflict keeps energy prices high for longer.
  3. High oil prices could turn into persistent inflation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Monitor whether the economic rebound is sustainable.
  2. Watch the inflation outlook closely, especially energy spillovers.
  3. Stand ready to adjust monetary policy as needed.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' keynote speech at the European Capital Markets Dialogue, 31 August 2026

ContextKeynote by the ESMA Chair at the European Capital Markets Dialogue in Dubrovnik, hosted by the Croatian and Luxembourg market supervisors.

Why it mattersThe ESMA Chair draws a line between smart simplification and deregulation that would weaken investor protection.

Problems raised
  1. Indiscriminate deregulation could weaken investor protection.
  2. Proportionality can slide into fragmentation.
  3. Risks increasingly cross national borders.
Solutions proposed
  1. Simplify through smart, risk-focused supervision.
  2. Use peer reviews and common supervisory actions across Europe.
  3. Reduce reporting burdens while improving risk detection.
Read the speech summary

1. Simplification built on confidence

Speaking in Dubrovnik at a conference hosted by Croatia's HANFA and Luxembourg's CSSF, ESMA Chair Verena Ross, whose term is ending, echoed the Lamfalussy report's call twenty-five years ago for agile regulation. Beyond the question of courage to simplify, she asked whether policymakers have confidence that simpler rules can still work. Complexity can give a false sense of control and, in an unpredictable world, make the system clumsy and less competitive. She rejected indiscriminate deregulation that would weaken investor protection or stability; the aim is a strong supervisory framework, using quality data, convergence and enforcement, that reaches its goals without ever more detailed rules.

2. The cost of fragmentation

She warned that proportionality must not turn into fragmentation: each exemption or national flexibility may make sense locally, but the accumulated differences impose hidden costs on the whole market, making it harder for firms to expand, investors to find opportunities and Europe to compete. A stronger European dimension of supervision should be seen as an opportunity; it will not erase differences between markets but can make them less of a barrier.

3. A joint undertaking and the 2030 picture

Whatever negotiators decide on the market integration and supervision package, she says supervision stays a partnership that combines national expertise with a European view, built through peer reviews, joint actions, colleges and shared methods. For 2030 she pictures supervision more integrated yet rooted in national markets, digital and data-driven, focused on outcomes, with fewer box-ticking duties, lighter reporting, predictable expectations for cross-border firms and investors confident to take part, moving Europe nearer a genuine single market for capital.

Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MB
· Michele Bullock Wiki · Reserve Bank of Australia WikiOpening remarks - 13th Irving Fisher Committee Conference

ContextSpeech (virtually) by Michele Bullock, Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, at the 13th Biennial Irving Fisher Committee on Central Bank Statistics (IFC) Conference, 20 August 2026.

Why it mattersA look at the statistics behind policy: data gaps, notably on climate, and how AI can help central banks analyse information.

Problems raised
  1. Central banks face a difficult technological and geopolitical environment.
  2. Data gaps remain, notably on climate-related risks.
  3. Statistics alone, without judgement, can mislead policy.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen governance of central bank data.
  2. Use AI to improve data discovery, analysis and risk monitoring.
  3. Share experience across central banks to build common approaches.
Read the speech summary

1. Why statistics matter

Opening remotely the thirteenth biennial gathering of the central bank statisticians' network named after Irving Fisher, Michele Bullock recalled that Fisher believed good economics starts with good measurement, yet warned that facts alone are not enough and need to be paired with economic theory and sound judgement. In an uncertain geopolitical setting, policymakers need faster insight and more granular data, while AI creates both opportunities and new challenges.

2. The committee's role and work

For nearly thirty years the network has been a forum for statistical cooperation among central banks. Its mandate was updated in 2025 to cover data governance, technology and AI as well as official statistics, since central banks are both major producers of official figures and heavy users of data, facing shared questions about quality, privacy, security and responsible AI. Recent work covers microdata, data science and AI (including a membership poll on how far central banks have adopted AI), data governance, and closing climate-related data gaps.

3. A new strategy: data for the future

A three-year strategy sets three priorities. First, modernise central bank statistics by combining traditional methods with new sources, strengthening rather than replacing official figures. Second, AI and data innovation, the top priority in the member survey, with emphasis on practical, replicable use cases. Third, data governance, so that data can be trusted and AI used with guardrails. The Central Bank Data Collaboration Group now sits under the committee, and members are invited to join small working groups.

4. Conference themes

The programme follows three themes: AI and advanced analytics; novel, granular data such as payments, firm-level, market and satellite information; and trust in data that is reliable and fit for purpose. She closed with Fisher's point that policy without adequate facts risks avoidable mistakes.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiPanel remarks about the European economy during a discussion on the global economic outlook at the World Economic Forum

ContextPanel remarks by Christine Lagarde on the global economic outlook at the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum.

Why it mattersA frank diagnosis of why Europe's growth model is weakening.

Problems raised
  1. The three pillars of Europe's growth model are weakening.
  2. Geopolitical tensions expose critical dependencies and security threats.
  3. Fragmented markets make it hard for European firms to scale and adopt AI.
Solutions proposed
  1. Remove barriers that fragment the Single Market.
  2. Integrate capital markets so scale-ups can raise funds in Europe.
  3. Create conditions for AI investment to spread across firms.
Read the speech summary

1. A growth model under strain

Speaking at a panel in Geneva, Christine Lagarde said the model that powered Europe's growth after the war relied on expanding trade, mid-tech manufacturing helped by cheap energy, and a stable rules-based order under a US security umbrella, and that all three are weakening. Europe has roughly double America's trade openness, yet over 2 500 trade restrictions were imposed worldwide last year. China now competes in about 40% of the sectors where the euro area holds an advantage, up from about 25% in the early 2000s, and electricity for energy-intensive industry costs more than double US prices. Geopolitical dependencies and security threats now enter investment decisions directly.

2. Strengths and domestic demand

Europe still holds more trade agreements than anyone else, leading precision manufacturing, a highly skilled workforce and a market of 450 million consumers. The euro area grew 1.5% last year entirely on domestic demand, and demand again carried a 0.4% quarterly gain in spring 2026.

3. Two barriers to scaling

To make that resilience durable, she says, Europe must use the size of its home market, especially for AI, so as not to repeat missing the first digital revolution; euro-area firms expect to put about 9% of investment into AI this year. Two barriers stand out. Single Market fragmentation means competitive pressure from AI-investing rivals largely stops at national borders. Capital-market fragmentation means EU scale-ups raise roughly half as much as San Francisco peers by their tenth year, and 12% have moved outside the EU. Responses include EU Inc, an optional EU-wide company form, and leaders' call for lawmakers to settle the capital-market integration plan before 2027.

Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
DR
· Dilma Rousseff Wiki · New Development Bank (BRICS) WikiSpecial Address by NDB President Dilma Rousseff at BRICS Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting Side Event (Seminar on the Role of the NDB in Mobilising Private Capital)

ContextSpecial address at a seminar held alongside the meeting of BRICS finance ministers and central bank governors in India, on mobilising private capital.

Why it mattersLists the tools the bank plans to use to attract private investors into development projects.

Problems raised
  1. Private capital is not mobilised enough for development.
  2. Investors face high risks.
  3. Financing tools are limited.
Solutions proposed
  1. Expand the toolkit with guarantees and risk-sharing.
  2. Offer trade finance, project bonds and equity funds.
  3. Partner with national investment funds.
Read the speech summary

1. A fragmented world needs private capital

Speaking at a BRICS finance side event in India on mobilising private capital, New Development Bank President Dilma Rousseff described a world of imbalances, tariffs, sanctions, high rich-country debt and climate urgency, with development needs in digital, energy, cities and infrastructure too large for any single actor. The aim is to create conditions for long-term institutional and private capital to flow into development; the NDB, a bank of and for the Global South without conditionalities, builds that bridge through better bankability, longer maturities and local-currency and swap solutions.

2. Funding, financing and preparation

On funding, the bank is a large issuer in China's Panda bond market, is growing in South Africa, and plans a rupee bond programme of about 250 billion rupees (2.5 billion dollars) over five years, taking planned India investment to 7.5 billion. On financing, it targets 30% non-sovereign lending now and 35% in 2027-31, with 40-50% in local currency, 45% for climate and 10% for innovation and digital projects, co-financing 20-30% of projects and adding guarantees, risk-sharing, project bonds and equity, backed by stronger credit appraisal. On preparation, it will help build bankable projects and act as a knowledge hub.

3. India and closing

India has about 10.5 billion dollars approved across 35 projects, including anchor investment in the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and a hybrid renewable energy project. She closed by saying that mobilising private capital is about trust, partnership and delivery.

Read full speech on ndb.int ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FK
· Fatih Karahan Wiki · Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye WikiRecent economic and financial developments in Turkey

ContextPress briefing by the Governor of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye presenting the third Inflation Report of 2026.

Why it mattersExplains how geopolitical shocks slowed disinflation and gives a numerical inflation path for 2027 and 2028.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical shocks disrupted the disinflation process.
  2. Energy-linked prices rose first after these shocks.
  3. Frequent supply shocks risk making inflation stickier.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep monetary policy tight enough to support disinflation.
  2. Act proactively to contain risk premiums and currency volatility.
  3. Aim for 15% inflation in 2027, 9% in 2028, then the 5% target.
Read the speech summary

1. Stance and global backdrop

Presenting the third Inflation Report of 2026, Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye Governor Fatih Karahan said geopolitical shocks have slowed disinflation but tight policy is visibly cooling demand, so the bank will keep its stance and use all its tools until price stability is reached. Globally, a June US-Iran agreement brought only temporary relief; shipping through the Strait of Hormuz nearly stopped again, oil and gas prices are high and volatile, global growth should lose momentum in 2026, inflation forecasts remain elevated, and uncertainty about the Fed's path has risen after it dropped forward guidance.

2. Weak demand, stronger exports

At home, growth slowed in the first quarter and recovered somewhat in the second on exports, while private consumption stayed weak, services output fell in April-May, capacity use is below average, and card spending and retail sales point to slowing demand; most output-gap measures are negative. Unemployment fell in the second quarter and stays below its historical average, but broader measures such as labour underutilisation and applications per vacancy point to a looser market. Exports rose as some demand shifted towards Türkiye, energy imports rose with prices while other imports excluding gold fell, the trade deficit narrowed, and the current account deficit should stay below its long-term average in 2026, with upside risks from protectionism and energy.

3. Inflation details

Annual inflation was 31.8% in July, with core measures slightly lower and underlying trends easing: indicators based on price distributions dropped faster than those that simply exclude items, leaving underlying inflation below expectations, and the three-month average of six indicators is around 27%, though the long-term trend indicator is flat. Administered prices have run above the consumer price index. Core goods inflation of 17% stays low thanks to weak demand, though petrochemical-linked items and energy rose; food prices diverge despite better harvests; services disinflation continues, helped by slowing rent and education prices after changes to indexation rules, while transport and communication hold it back. Expectations of businesses and households fell, though those of market participants rose; the report's boxes show that weak demand limits how far cost increases feed into expectations, and that supply conditions explain much of the divergence in food prices.

4. Policy and forecasts

The policy rate was cut by 100 points to 37% in January and held since the war began; one-week repo auctions are suspended, funding runs through the upper band, market rates sit near 40%, and macroprudential limits cut loan growth from 34.6% to about 25% while lira deposits reached 62% of the total. Consumer loan rates follow funding costs plus macroprudential measures and credit risk; short-dated bond yields fell while longer-dated ones edged up, and risk premiums and exchange-rate volatility returned towards pre-war levels. Gross reserves rose by 30 billion dollars to 185 billion. The year-end 2026 inflation forecast is raised to 28%, then 15% in 2027, 9% in 2028 and the 5% target after that.

5. Assumptions and risks

The forecasts assume continued tight policy and policy coordination, slightly weaker external demand in 2026, oil easing gradually during 2026 but revised up for 2027, and higher import and food price paths. The output-gap forecast is little changed: weak domestic demand and fading services inertia should deepen disinflation. Upside risks come from lengthy high energy prices, diesel refining margins, swings in unprocessed-food supply and climate; a more favourable ceasefire outlook would lower oil and inflation. Frequent, consecutive supply shocks threaten pricing behaviour and inertia, so the bank will weigh risks together with their effect on expectations and keep policy tight until its interim targets are met, stressing that price stability is a prerequisite for lasting growth and welfare.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiSpecial address - 31st CGC Awards

ContextSpecial address by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the 31st CGC Awards, Kuala Lumpur, 11 August 2026.

Why it mattersShows how Malaysia's central bank wants to help small firms through shocks without simply shifting risk onto public schemes.

Problems raised
  1. Small businesses face geopolitical, technological and climate disruptions.
  2. Temporary cash-flow pressures threaten viable firms.
  3. Credit guarantees can shift risk instead of sharing it.
Solutions proposed
  1. Offer targeted relief to viable firms during disruptions.
  2. Strengthen and coordinate Malaysia's credit guarantee framework with World Bank help.
  3. Combine financing with capability-building for SMEs.
Read the speech summary

1. Adapting to change

Speaking at the 31st Credit Guarantee Corporation awards in Malaysia, Governor Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour said adaptation, not standing still, drives success amid geopolitical uncertainty, rapid technology and climate disruption. Malaysia is in a strong position, with 5.4% growth in the first quarter, 2.9% unemployment and 1.6% inflation. Small firms, about 40% of output and nearly half of jobs, still face higher costs, thin margins and slow customer payments, which a 5 billion ringgit relief facility has eased, though temporary relief cannot answer recurring shocks.

2. A new guarantee scheme

He launched a 10 billion ringgit BNM-CGC Guarantee Scheme, a more scalable, market-based way to share risk for microenterprises, start-ups and firms in sustainability, innovation, strategic sectors and food security. Some viable firms are overlooked by conventional assessment because they have little history or collateral. A guarantee should not dilute lending standards; what makes it worthwhile is financing that would otherwise be declined or offered on better terms. The bank, with World Bank technical help, will also improve the wider guarantee framework through better coordination, targeting and data.

3. Three areas of progress

Widen the financing frontier to innovation and climate activities; assess firms in totality using cash flows, e-invoices and payment behaviour, as a complement to prudent underwriting; and pair finance with capability-building through platforms such as imSME and MyKNP, so that more firms grow into stronger mid-sized companies. His warning to lenders: sharing risk must never become a way of passing it on.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiKeynote address - Sasana Symposium 2026

ContextKeynote address by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the Sasana Symposium 2026, Kuala Lumpur, 28 July 2026.

Why it mattersMalaysia's Governor explains how a mid-sized open economy should respond to fragmentation: attract investment, rebuild budgets and train workers.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical fragmentation is reshaping trade and investment flows.
  2. Overlapping shocks keep hitting the global economy.
  3. Weak public finances limit the room to respond to crises.
Solutions proposed
  1. Attract high-value investment through a national investment framework.
  2. Strengthen public finances to keep buffers for future shocks.
  3. Expand technical, STEM and AI education for better jobs.
Read the speech summary

1. The Gelam tree and renewal

Speaking at the Sasana Symposium on the theme of reforms for resilience, Governor Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour likened structural reform to the Gelam tree, which thrives in harsh conditions by shedding bark and renewing itself. Monetary policy is an important defence and the current stance fits the growth and inflation outlook, but as a demand tool it cannot fix underlying weaknesses; reforms invest in the economy's future, raising productivity, competitiveness and staying power. Malaysia reformed after the Asian crisis, again when investment slowed in the mid-2010s, and after the pandemic; the central bank's part is preserving macroeconomic stability so reforms can take hold, through steady prices, a healthy banking system and well-functioning markets, and it will keep doing so. The medium-term outlook stays favourable, with firm growth and manageable inflation.

2. Productive capacity and public finances

The latest reform phase has two pillars. On investment, the aim is not simply more but the right kind, bringing technology, better jobs and greater value; Malaysia approved 815 billion ringgit over two years, almost half of GDP, mostly in advanced manufacturing, semiconductors and digital technology. On fiscal capacity, phased-in targeted diesel subsidies, subsidy reforms, tax adjustments and a fiscal responsibility law cut the deficit from 6.2% of GDP in 2020 to 3.7% in 2025. Growth was 5.2% last year, the ringgit led regional currencies, and 4-5% growth, toward the upper end, is expected this year despite the energy shock. None of this happened by chance, he stressed: difficult choices were made early and in sequence. A 1.5 billion dollar global sukuk drew nearly five times the amount offered, at record-low spreads.

3. Where to go: jobs, skills and wages

He set out anchors for the next stage. First, make growth felt at home through better jobs: high-skilled employment rose from 27.5% to 30.1% of the total between 2019 and 2025, and the investment pipeline could create about 245 000 jobs, many of them higher skilled, yet over two thirds of workers hold low or mid-skilled roles. That calls for continuous upskilling, digital fluency, vocational training and STEM and AI education under the 13th Malaysia Plan, plus wages that reward productivity, minimum wage increases as a floor, and a more coherent social protection system that tackles the roots of vulnerability.

4. Value creation and a better financial sector

Second, move from extracting value to creating and retaining it: investment should leave behind stronger local firms, skills and technology diffusion, through research, design, engineering and programmes such as SemiconStart, and growth must stay sustainable given the country's rich biodiversity. Third, everyone has a role: the upcoming Financial Sector Blueprint 2027-2030 aims for finance that builds resilience to climate shocks, supports prosperity by channelling capital to productive firms, with Islamic finance as a force for change, and is future-proofed through proportionate regulation that does not curb innovation.

5. Co-creation and closing

The central bank is moving towards co-creation with banks, businesses and technology players, through platforms such as the climate change joint committee, the regulatory sandbox and iTEKAD, which will launch an employment initiative. Countries should stay ahead of the curve instead of solving yesterday's problems. Closing on Gelam bark that let Malay ships flex with the waves, he said resilience means adapting without losing one's bearings, and the task now is to turn stronger foundations into stronger incomes, investment into opportunity and resilience into progress that many people share.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MB
· Michele Bullock Wiki · Reserve Bank of Australia WikiMonetary policy in an era of shocks

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia at the yearly Anika Foundation fundraising lunch in Sydney.

Why it mattersThe Reserve Bank of Australia's Governor compares today's shocks with the 1970s oil crises to explain why inflation targets matter.

Problems raised
  1. Supply shocks have become more frequent, from COVID to trade tensions.
  2. The Middle East conflict is disrupting energy markets.
  3. Severe weather hits production and trade.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep a credible inflation target to anchor expectations.
  2. Learn from the 1970s oil shocks to avoid past mistakes.
  3. Respond flexibly as the outlook changes quickly.
Read the speech summary

1. A run of supply shocks

At a Sydney fundraising lunch for a youth mental health charity, her third as Governor, the head of the Reserve Bank of Australia described recent years as a succession of disruptions on the supply side: the pandemic, the energy surge after Russia invaded Ukraine, and now the Middle East conflict, extreme weather and trade disputes. She compared this period with the oil crises of the 1970s and argued that today's economy absorbs such shocks better, largely because credible inflation targets keep expectations steady. Shocks still cut growth and real incomes, so the bank's task is to stop them from turning into lasting inflation. Because price and capacity pressures were already elevated, the bank raised rates earlier in the year.

2. Where inflation stands

After the post-pandemic surge, Australian inflation fell markedly in 2024 and 2025 and looked set to return to target. It then climbed again, above target even before oil prices jumped. Headline inflation reached 4% in May, and the underlying measure, while following the bank's May forecast, remains too high. This reflects demand pressing on capacity and some pass-through of fuel costs, for example into the price of new homes, and firms report rising non-wage costs they intend to pass on. A recent survey showed inflation is the top economic worry of Australians.

3. How the economy is adjusting

Five months into the conflict, its full effect is still unclear and commodity prices remain volatile, while earlier rate rises have not yet fully worked through. Demand is slowing broadly as planned. Household spending has held up better than very weak confidence suggests, helped by a temporary cut in fuel tax, and saving rates are steady. Business confidence fell at the outbreak but has partly recovered, and investment has been stronger than expected thanks to data centres. Housing has cooled more than forecast, with price falls concentrated in Sydney and Melbourne, though prices are near their level of February; fewer than 1% of borrowers owe more than their home is worth, and few face serious repayment difficulty. The bank does not target house prices, only their effect on spending and inflation. Unemployment has risen a little more than expected and some firms paused hiring, but job advertisements stay firm; some further loosening of the labour market is still needed.

4. From calm to turbulence

From the late 1980s to the 2008 crisis, the so-called Great Moderation brought steadier growth and inflation. Better frameworks helped, such as floating exchange rates, labour reforms and inflation targets, but so did luck: fewer commodity and productivity shocks and the integration of China, which lowered costs worldwide. Monetary policy could then focus on demand, and price stability and full employment rarely conflicted. Since the pandemic, repeated adverse supply shocks have lifted prices and held back growth together. For Australia they mean a loss of real income, on top of years of weak productivity. Business investment, including in artificial intelligence, is key to lifting capacity, though its effects are uncertain. When supply grows slowly, any level of demand produces more inflation, sharpening the trade-off between the bank's two goals.

5. Lessons from the 1970s

In 1973 and 1979 oil prices rose two- to threefold. The bigger damage came afterwards, as firms passed on costs, workers sought compensating wage rises and inflation spread and persisted. Early policy tried to protect activity, expectations became entrenched, and only harsh tightening and deep recessions brought inflation down. In Australia inflation reached 12.5% in 1982 and unemployment climbed from about 6% to 10.5% in 1983. Today the economy uses far less oil per unit of output, inflation targets anchor expectations and flexible supply chains adapt faster, so a single shock is less likely to cause lasting high inflation and unemployment; several overlapping shocks are harder to handle.

6. Policy outlook

The bank's aims are unchanged. Even if the oil disruption fades, fuel costs will keep spreading to other prices, and domestic pressures were already too strong. Some further slowing in demand growth is likely needed, and the open question is whether this year's tightening is enough. Monetary policy cannot fix slow productivity, which limits non-inflationary growth and real wage gains. The board stands ready to raise rates again if required.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiRelease of the Monetary Policy Report

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 15 July 2026.

Why it mattersExplains how the Bank of Canada separates one-off oil effects from lasting inflation.

Problems raised
  1. Canada's growth stalled under tariffs and uncertainty.
  2. High oil prices could spread to other prices.
  3. Inflation could get stuck above 2%.
Solutions proposed
  1. Hold the policy rate at 2.25%.
  2. Look through direct oil effects but block persistent inflation.
  3. Watch the Middle East and US trade risks closely.
Read the speech summary

1. Rates on hold, growth resuming

Presenting the Monetary Policy Report, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said Governing Council held the policy rate at 2.25%. Growth, flat over the past year amid tariffs and uncertainty, appears to be resuming: second-quarter GDP is estimated at 2.5% annualised, consumers are resilient, housing is steadying, exports are recovering and business investment is rising, led by oil and gas. Unemployment sits between 6.5% and 7%, and growth is projected at 0.7% in 2026 and 1.8% a year in 2027 and 2028.

2. Inflation and risks

Consumer price inflation reached 3.2% in May on gasoline prices tied to the Middle East conflict, but excluding gasoline it was 2.2% and core measures stay near 2%, with no broad spillover so far. Inflation should come back to its 2% goal early next year if oil settles around 70-75 dollars, though futures have risen since the forecast was finalised. The main risks are the Middle East conflict, US trade relations, inflation getting stuck above target, or a stalled recovery; the bank will not let oil become persistent inflation and stays ready to adjust.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
LK
· Lesetja Kganyago Wiki · South African Reserve Bank WikiRemarks - annual dinner for the Heads of Foreign Missions accredited in South Africa

ContextAfter-dinner remarks by the Governor of the South African Reserve Bank to the ambassadors and heads of foreign missions accredited in South Africa, hosted at the central bank.

Why it mattersSouth Africa's Governor explains to foreign diplomats why rates rose again as a second wave of inflation followed the 2022 surge.

Problems raised
  1. A second wave of inflation follows the 2022 surge.
  2. Inflation expectations rose sharply, even over two to five years.
  3. Geopolitical shocks and weak indicators cloud the outlook.
Solutions proposed
  1. Raise rates so inflation does not get stuck above 3%.
  2. Use the framework's flexibility to focus on the medium term.
  3. Rely on lower oil prices to help return to target faster.
Read the speech summary

1. A turbulent world

Addressing the heads of foreign missions at the Reserve Bank, Governor Lesetja Kganyago noted that since the last such dinner in 2019 the world has seen a pandemic, the Ukrainian and Middle Eastern wars, a major inflation surge and an AI boom, yet his 2019 worries, eroding multilateralism and pressure on central bank autonomy, remain. The global economy has proved resilient thanks to the AI-driven investment boom, loose fiscal policy, continued openness to trade without a retaliatory tariff spiral, and emerging markets, which grow near 4% and now make up over 60% of world output.

2. South Africa's re-rating

South Africa has had rating upgrades from Fitch and S&P, left the FATF grey list, seen six straight quarters of growth, ended load-shedding, and is expected to stabilise public debt this year, with long-term yields down over 300 basis points. The new 3% inflation target replaces the 3-6% range, though a supply shock forced a May rate rise and survey expectations rose even at long horizons, a reminder of why the bank acted to avoid getting stuck above target. The real economy has yet to show the gains, but he expects growth to return after fifteen lost years, and urged trust and multilateralism.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiPlaying the long game - how should monetary policy adapt to the Great Reconfiguration?

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Italy at a meeting of a central bank research network he helped launch in 2024.

Why it mattersA thoughtful Bank of Italy speech on how monetary policy must change when geopolitical shocks become permanent rather than temporary.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical tensions and trade fragmentation are now lasting features.
  2. Uncertainty is both high and persistent.
  3. New shocks are hard to classify as supply or demand shocks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Periodically review how the inflation outlook is assessed.
  2. Reassess the policy stance and how the central bank reacts.
  3. Use research networks to understand structural change.
Read the speech summary

1. A changing world for central banks

Closing a European central bank research network on monetary policy transmission in Rome, the Governor of the Bank of Italy noted that the shocks he called exceptional in 2024 have become permanent features. Geopolitical tension, trade fragmentation and technological disruption hit both supply and demand and can alter how monetary policy itself works. This calls for regular review of how central banks read inflation, judge their stance and decide, while keeping price stability as the mandate. The review of its strategy completed by the ECB in 2025 already moved in that direction. He structured his remarks around three questions: how to handle an energy shock that lifts inflation while weakening activity, how structural shifts alter the outlook and the channels of policy, and how decisions should be taken when uncertainty is this high.

2. The euro area before and after the Gulf war

In 2025 the euro area absorbed US tariffs, Chinese competition and high uncertainty, growing 1.4% (about 1% without Ireland) thanks to employment, defence and transition investment and easier policy, while inflation returned to target. Two warning signs remained: households kept saving more than before the pandemic, and industry stalled under Chinese competition in high-tech sectors, hitting manufacturing countries such as Germany and Italy and possibly reducing future growth potential if it discourages investment. The war in the Persian Gulf then raised costs, selling prices and short-term inflation expectations, while consumer confidence and services activity fell and banks tightened lending.

3. Neither ignore nor overreact

He rejected two simple answers. Looking through the shock underestimates it: damage to infrastructure could keep prices high, and the Strait of Hormuz also carries fertilisers and aluminium. Policy cannot stop energy costs from spreading but must prevent them from shaping wage and price expectations. Yet this is not 2022: demand is weaker, real rates are higher, oil rather than gas is driving the shock, and Europe has more LNG capacity and renewable power. Large cost shocks pass quickly into prices, as firms now reprice faster with digital tools and households recently scarred by inflation adjust expectations sooner, but they also cut spending and investment. The ECB raised its deposit rate by a quarter point in June because projections showed inflation at 3% in 2026 returning to target in late 2027, risks were tilted upwards and expectations had to stay anchored; the decision held up across scenarios. Talks between Washington and Tehran could lower energy prices, but no path is predetermined.

4. The Great Reconfiguration

Fragmentation, AI and digital finance, ageing and climate change are transforming the economy at the same time, a period he called a Great Reconfiguration after the Great Moderation. He drew a cautious parallel with the Belle Époque before 1914, when innovation, trade and financial integration coexisted with inequality, rivalry and an arms race, to show that structural change rarely unfolds smoothly.

5. Three questions for policy

First, trends interact: AI needs energy and water and so complements the green transition, which it can also accelerate, while fragmentation may cut access to inputs and data and ageing may limit skills. This makes it harder to tell lasting change from cyclical swings, and humility is needed with real-time data. Second, transmission may change: AI pricing and digital banking could make inflation and deposit rates react faster, whereas older populations borrow less for homes and goods and strategic investment in resilience responds less to borrowing costs. The effect of a rate change thus becomes less predictable and must be reassessed constantly. Third, the reaction function must adapt: demographics push the neutral rate down while AI and fragmentation act in both directions, so central banks should test decisions against alternative scenarios on energy, supply chains, productivity, finance and expectations, not only a central forecast. Structural change may also shift where financial stability risks sit. Mistaking a lasting productivity gain for overheating would make policy too tight, while treating a temporary boom as permanent capacity would make it too loose.

6. Conclusion

Supply shocks are becoming more frequent, persistent and tied to structural change. Central banks must draw on computer science, political and climate science and energy economics, and work across disciplines, keeping their mandate in sight while adapting their analysis. Just as epidemiology entered policy debates during the pandemic, new fields are now part of the toolkit. He thanked the research network for taking these questions seriously from its launch and expected its partnerships between economists and other specialists to keep producing results as the future approaches faster than anticipated.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiMundell's plan for a European currency - from theory to history

ContextWelcome address by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, at the "International macroeconomics in a changing world - old questions, new realities" workshop, organised by the Bank of Italy, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) and LUISS ….

Why it mattersA short reflection linking the intellectual origins of the euro to today's geopolitical and technological shifts.

Problems raised
  1. War and geopolitical rivalry are reshaping trade and energy.
  2. Economic fragmentation creates strategic dependencies.
  3. AI raises questions about productivity, inequality and sovereignty.
Solutions proposed
  1. Draw lessons from Mundell's work on monetary unions.
  2. Strengthen the international monetary system.
  3. Support research on how geopolitics shapes money.
Read the speech summary

1. Honouring Mundell

Opening a Rome workshop held with CEPR and LUISS in memory of the Nobel laureate Robert Mundell, the Governor of the Bank of Italy recalled that Mundell's work covered optimal currency areas, the global monetary system and its geopolitics. His 1961 analysis saw low labour mobility as Europe's main obstacle to a shared currency, while others stressed the lack of common fiscal stabilisation.

2. A political project

In a 1969 plan, Mundell argued that Europe's money should rest above all on political reasons. Panetta agreed: monetary union grew from the post-war drive for reconciliation that produced the Coal and Steel Community in 1951, and three decades after Mundell's plan the euro was born.

3. Two waves of crises

The 2008 financial crisis and the 2010-11 debt crisis split the area into core and periphery, with uncoordinated budgets leaving monetary policy alone until Draghi's pledge restored calm. The pandemic and energy shock, though larger, met a joint response through Next Generation EU and national support.

4. What remains to be done

Europe should revive growth with reforms and joint investment in research, energy, digital networks and AI; build a true savings and investments union with simpler rules and a common safe bond; and digitalise payments, including a digital euro, to protect monetary sovereignty, a risk Mundell already linked to the dollar. Quoting Monnet's idea that Europe is built through crises, he argued that such slow, crisis-led progress no longer fits a fast-changing world: Europe must act before crises force it to, and the euro stands for unity, sovereignty and shared values.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
UL
· Ursula von der Leyen Wiki · European Commission WikiOpening speech by President von der Leyen at the Ukraine Recovery Conference

ContextOpening speech at the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Gdańsk, Poland, hosted by Prime Minister Donald Tusk with Ukrainian and EU leaders.

Why it mattersDonors and investors coordinate the rebuilding of Ukraine, with the EU as the largest backer.

Problems raised
  1. Russia's war devastated Ukraine's economy.
  2. Ukraine needs massive investment to rebuild.
  3. Investors see high risks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen Ukraine's economic foundations.
  2. Advance Ukraine's European path.
  3. Create opportunities for investment and growth.
Read the speech summary

1. Gdańsk and Ukraine's European path

Speaking in Gdańsk at the Ukraine Recovery Conference, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen praised the city's solidarity, from hosting 5 000 families to teaching in Ukrainian, and drew a parallel between Gdańsk's role in Poland's freedom and Ukraine's courage today. Ukraine's forces have shifted battlefield momentum and its drone production now matches or exceeds Russia's. Accession talks opened this month with the first cluster, on rule of law, democratic institutions and public administration; accession remains merit-based, and Ukraine is already joining roaming and payment schemes, so that investing in Ukraine means investing in a single market worth about 20 trillion euros.

2. Money and investment

The EU and member states have provided over 200 billion euros in support, and a new support loan adds 90 billion over two years; the first tranche of 3.2 billion in macro-financial aid is being paid today, and payments start soon from 6 billion for drone production. A new flagship fund, billed as the biggest equity vehicle for Ukraine's reconstruction, is ready, backed by the EU, Poland, France, Germany and Italy, able to mobilise up to half a billion this year and 1 billion over time, with public capital taking first losses to draw private investors.

3. A security partnership

Ukraine is also a security provider, whose battlefield experience and innovative defence firms, from interceptor drones to jamming systems, benefit Europe; examples include Ukrainian-designed drones built in Germany and missile fuel soon made in Denmark. The mix of Ukrainian ingenuity and European industrial scale is the recipe, and the lesson of Gdańsk is that solidarity leads to freedom.

Read full speech on ec.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiGlobal imbalances, growth and stability

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Canada in Paris to Paris Europlace and the France-Canada Chamber of Commerce, weeks after a G7 finance meeting there.

Why it mattersSpoken in Paris, the Bank of Canada Governor names what China, the US and Europe should each change to reduce global imbalances.

Problems raised
  1. Global imbalances are growing again.
  2. Non-bank financial firms play a larger, less visible role.
  3. Support for open trade weakens when imbalances rise.
Solutions proposed
  1. China should consume more, the US save more, Europe invest more.
  2. Adjust early before pressures build up.
  3. Cooperate on financial risks and keep trade and investment open.
Read the speech summary

1. Imbalances and capital flows

Speaking in Paris, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem welcomed the US-Iran agreement and the easing of energy prices, then turned to the widening of global imbalances discussed by G7 finance chiefs. Trade deficits and surpluses are normal, but when too large and one-sided for too long they spill over through trade, exchange rates and asset prices, and strain relations between countries. China's reliance on investment and exports has created overcapacity and deflationary hyper-competition and sparked tariffs. His message: look at imbalances through capital flows and international investment, and avoid overextending the monetary and financial system, adapting before a crisis forces change.

2. Lessons from history

The gold standard forced adjustment through wages and prices and could not survive the strains of war; interwar tariffs and retaliation deepened the 1930s collapse; Bretton Woods ended in 1971 when domestic priorities overwhelmed the external anchor. The lessons are that excessive imbalances create tension, that when domestic goals override international rules the rules give way, and that shifting costs onto others with tariffs or devaluation fails. The 2008-09 crisis showed how fast stress travels through interlinked finance. Adjustment delayed eventually becomes adjustment imposed.

3. Today's landscape

Imbalances reflect domestic ones: Chinese and European savings exceed investment, so capital flows to the US, whose strong consumption and fiscal deficits leave a historically large negative net investment position. The dollar's reserve role may have let imbalances persist and one-way flows fuel bubbles, possibly now in the AI boom. Meanwhile risk has migrated from better-regulated banks to non-bank intermediaries: hedge funds now buy much sovereign debt using leverage and short-term funding, and dollar stablecoins let flows reverse faster, beyond authorities' sight. The two risks are misallocated inflows stretching valuations, and a sudden reversal.

4. Three priorities

Reducing imbalances means China consuming more, the US saving more and Europe investing more, ideally in a coordinated way, with signs of progress in China's plan, Europe's integration and US deficit ambitions. He urged openness, with Canada and the EU deepening trade ties; investability, creating more safe assets, fast payments infrastructure and attractive investment outside the US through strong institutions, open capital accounts and removal of barriers such as Canada's interprovincial ones; and transparency, with better data on non-banks, foreign exchange and cross-border flows, stress tests reflecting today's speed, and closer work by the IMF, FSB and BIS. Support for openness weakens when imbalances grow or openness is seen as a weakness, but history shows protectionism costs efficiency and fragments markets. Markets cannot price what they cannot see, and while firms manage their own risks, systemic risks can build beyond any single firm's view. Resilience, he concluded, is a choice that does not happen by good intentions alone but by reinforcing systems so they do not break under stress, with responsibility shared between public and private, domestic and international actors.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiHearing of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament

ContextStatement by Christine Lagarde before the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as part of the regular Monetary Dialogue.

Why it mattersThe ECB President tells the European Parliament how the bank would respond to a temporary versus a lasting inflation overshoot.

Problems raised
  1. War in the Middle East suddenly changed the economic outlook.
  2. After 2022-23, prices and wages may react faster to new shocks.
  3. Inflation expectations could lose their anchor if the shock persists.
Solutions proposed
  1. Look at the risks around the forecast, not only the baseline.
  2. Adjust policy moderately if the overshoot is temporary.
  3. Act forcefully if inflation deviates significantly and durably from 2%.
Read the speech summary

1. Outlook after the Middle East war

Christine Lagarde told the European Parliament's economic committee that the euro area was gaining traction, with first-quarter growth of 0.3%, just before the Middle Eastern conflict erupted. The war now weighs on activity, especially services, while manufacturing has held up on stock building and defence spending. June staff projections have growth rising from 0.8% this year to 1.2% next year and 1.5% after that, with weaker domestic demand but solid household balance sheets. Inflation rose to 3.2% in May, driven by energy inflation above 10%, with core inflation at 2.6%. Short-term expectations have jumped but longer-term measures remain near 2%. Projections have inflation averaging 3.0% this year, easing to 2.3% then returning to 2.0% by 2028, with upside risks to prices and downside risks to growth, and the peace agreement remains fragile.

2. The June rate rise

The ECB raised its three key rates by 25 basis points in June, a decision that holds in every staff scenario. It will stay data-dependent and move meeting by meeting, basing choices on the inflation outlook and risks, underlying inflation and the strength of transmission, without pre-committing to a path.

3. How the strategy handles supply shocks

She explained that the 2025 strategy review rests on three principles. First, assess the shock: monetary policy cannot cut energy prices but must judge spillovers to other prices and wages; larger, more persistent shocks have non-linear effects, and strong demand or tight labour markets make pass-through easier. This shock looks smaller than the last episode, and starts from a different context, with inflation near target and policy no longer highly accommodative, though price and wage setting may now be more sensitive. Second, look at risks around the baseline, using scenarios, since big shocks can cause disproportionate deviations. Third, tailor the response: look through small, temporary shocks, make a measured adjustment for a sizeable but short-lived overshoot, and respond forcefully or persistently if inflation would deviate significantly and for long. The ECB is in the middle case, with no evidence yet of de-anchored expectations or second-round effects. She added that monetary policy cannot offset such shocks fully, so energy resilience matters, and thanked the committee for progress on the digital euro legislation.

Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
LK
· Lesetja Kganyago Wiki · South African Reserve Bank WikiKeynote address - 2026 Youth Leadership Summit

ContextKeynote address by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank, at the 2026 Youth Leadership Summit, Johannesburg, 20 June 2026.

Why it mattersSouth Africa's Governor defends the new low inflation target and the central bank's independence before a young audience.

Problems raised
  1. Key economic decisions are made far from the people they affect.
  2. The central bank's constitutional protection was directly challenged.
  3. Critics underestimate the long-term cost of tolerating higher inflation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep a low 3% inflation target, which lowers borrowing costs.
  2. Accept that no policy delivers everything at once without trade-offs.
  3. Train leaders to use evidence and resist pressure when needed.
Read the speech summary

1. Four lessons from a career

Speaking to a youth leadership summit, Governor Lesetja Kganyago said policy decisions that shape lives are made in rooms young people never see, and he drew on four experiences. Treasury's case for expanding HIV treatment was first rejected, then, after a joint task-team report, the government launched the world's largest treatment programme. The Gauteng e-toll proposal, backed by analysis and feasibility work, met fierce opposition, and he disagreed with a respected priest, showing that leadership sometimes means saying no even to people one admires. The Public Protector's report threatened the Reserve Bank's mandate and independence, so he took it on review, rallied staff and prevailed. The new 3% inflation target was opposed on procedure after critics could not fight the analysis, and was won through explanation, credible research, legal mandate and a long relationship with the Finance Minister.

2. Leading under uncertainty, with sound analysis

Policy leadership means deciding when answers are incomplete: ask what problem is being solved, what evidence exists and what is unknown, and neither wait for certainty nor act carelessly. Good analysis starts by clarifying the problem, uses data that is questioned and put in context, keeps assumptions realistic, such as spending multipliers that ignore fiscal constraints, or the claim that tolerating higher inflation is costless when lenders charge more for expected inflation, weighs trade-offs, as with the green transition's costs to coal, and is honest about uncertainty.

3. Independence, credibility and humility

Leaders must withstand pressure and resist shaping analysis to please political principals. History shows the cost of lost independence: in the 1970s Arthur Burns's Fed loosened under political pressure, producing high inflation and low credibility, in an era of secrecy. Trust is built slowly and lost fast, and protecting the institution's credibility for tomorrow is part of the job, which is why central banking moved towards independence, transparency and accountability. Finally, collaboration and humility matter: he wants considered disagreement from his staff, seeks challenge, and advises young people to surround themselves with people who think differently. His closing point: real leadership has little to do with rank, assurance or applause; it means deciding wisely amid doubt, disciplining oneself with facts and holding firm to principle when pressed, while sturdy institutions come from people who reason carefully and behave honestly.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' speech at the EFAMA conference, 12 June 2026

ContextSpeech by the ESMA Chair at the Annual General Meeting of EFAMA, the European fund and asset management association, in Brussels.

Why it mattersThe ESMA Chair sets out priorities for European fund managers as the Middle East war adds stagflation risks.

Problems raised
  1. Middle East war adds uncertainty and stagflation risks.
  2. Retail investors find products and disclosures too complex.
  3. New technologies bring cyber and operational risks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Simplify the framework for asset managers.
  2. Put retail investors at the centre of the savings and investments union.
  3. Monitor market resilience and fund risks closely.
Read the speech summary

1. Simplifying reporting

Speaking at the asset managers' association meeting in Brussels, ESMA Chair Verena Ross set four priorities: simpler reporting, digital innovation, market resilience and retail participation. On reporting, ESMA's May reports found more than 100 European and national obligations on funds and managers, so it proposes a common single template in a modular system, with managers reporting once and authorities, including the ECB and central banks, sharing and reusing the data through a central hub while national authorities still collect it. Implementation starts with AIFMD and UCITS reporting, with draft technical standards consulted by year-end and finalised in the first half of 2027. For transaction reporting, ESMA has short-term relief ideas such as revising two-sided reporting duties and an end-state integrated model across EMIR, MiFIR and SFTR, being tested through cost-benefit analysis, with attention to timelines to avoid repeated system rebuilds.

2. Tokenisation of funds

Tokenisation is often better seen as a shift in the plumbing surrounding funds than a break with the fund model; it may automate functions, speed subscriptions and redemptions, improve registers and cut reconciliations, and give investors accessibility and longer trading hours. Tokenised Treasury and money-market products total several billion dollars, small but growing. ESMA takes an evidence-based view: key questions are whether the ledger is the official register, whether transfers are final on-chain, and whether investors hold units directly, and it is working with national authorities on real cases and possible regulatory barriers. Investors must understand their rights and risks, including cyber and operational dependencies, and legal certainty and interoperability are needed so that national differences in registers, title, custody, settlement finality and insolvency do not recreate fragmentation.

3. Market resilience and vulnerabilities

The Middle East war added to tensions, bringing signs of stagflation, higher bond yields and tighter conditions, with corporate credit risk and debt sustainability concerns re-emerging. Markets and infrastructure proved resilient, including orderly clearing of energy contracts despite sharp margin calls, but valuations in some segments are stretched and markets seem optimistic about the war's duration, while performance is concentrated in technology. In an AI-driven correction, EU equity funds would be hit hard because 45% of their assets are in US equities, and tech is a third of the S&P 500 against 18% of the Euro Stoxx 50. Other watch points: hedge-fund leverage and its role in government bond turmoil, fund liquidity tools now reported systematically, and private credit of about 0.1 trillion euros, opaque, illiquid and increasingly connected to banks and insurers.

4. Retail investors

The savings and investments union puts ordinary investors at the centre, but the investor journey feels burdensome, information is complex, costs unclear and trust uneven. The Retail Investment Strategy should refocus rules on outcomes: valuable products, clear disclosures and advice aligned with investors' interests. ESMA will balance simplification with safeguards, especially disclosures and suitability, adapting information to digital channels; for the PRIIPs key document it expects changes to a product-at-a-glance section and performance, replacing scenarios with past performance for funds, and simpler cost calculations, with consumer testing. Rules alone are not enough: trust, fair costs and financial literacy matter, and success is measured by whether markets work for the people they serve.

Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiToward a European Energy Union

ContextSpeech to euro area and EU finance ministers at the Eurogroup in inclusive format; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersUrges an energy union to cut Europe's high and volatile power prices, estimating that finishing planned grid links could lower average electricity prices by more than 10 percent.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East war has cut oil and gas supply and hits poorer importers hardest.
  2. Most new European support measures are untargeted, which mutes price signals and wastes money.
  3. Europe's energy prices are high and volatile, and it still imports over half its energy.
Solutions proposed
  1. Target any further support and keep the incentive to save energy.
  2. Expand grids and interconnectors under a common EU energy blueprint.
  3. Protect the Emissions Trading System to spur clean investment.
Read the speech summary

1. The shock and the lessons of 2022

Three months into the Middle East war, world oil supply is about thirteen percent below its prewar level and liquefied gas about twenty percent, with very uneven effects. Georgieva first asked Europe to help the hardest-hit poor countries reach fertilisers and diesel. She praised decades of transition policy, which cut the energy intensity of European output by more than forty percent and ended dependence on Russia; today's gas shock is much smaller than in 2022, though the oil shock is almost as large.

2. Targeting support

Most new aid measures are temporary and cheaper than before, but again largely untargeted, which mutes the price signal and reduces energy saving. In 2022 over two-thirds of support was poorly aimed; protecting only the poorest forty percent of households would have saved almost two-thirds of the cost, whereas the richest fifth received nearly three times more than the poorest. The IMF therefore urges targeted help that still preserves savings.

3. Why an energy union

Three facts make the case. European industry pays two to three times more for electricity than American and Chinese rivals, and the doubling of real industrial energy prices has cut value added in energy-intensive industries by an estimated eighteen percent. Prices are also volatile and dispersed, with some countries paying over three times as much as others. And the union still imports more than half its energy, so outside disruptions pass quickly into prices.

4. How to get there

Speed up cheap renewables, integrate the internal market and keep private incentives right. Completing planned interconnectors, with more solar, wind and nuclear power, could lower average electricity prices by more than ten percent, and prices often fall on both sides of a new link; part of export revenue can be shared with the public. A common blueprint for supply, storage and interconnection is needed because wind and sun are unevenly spread. The carbon market should be protected: its revenue could reach about one percent of output, more than the public investment cost of the transition. Europe should use the crisis and act as one.

Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KP
· Kyriakos Pierrakakis Wiki · Eurogroup WikiRemarks by Kyriakos Pierrakakis following the Eurogroup meeting of 11 June 2026

ContextPress conference by the Eurogroup President after the monthly meeting of euro area finance ministers on 11 June 2026.

Why it mattersEuro area ministers' joint reading of the energy shock and its risks for growth and inflation.

Problems raised
  1. Energy markets remain under pressure.
  2. Risks to growth and inflation require attention.
  3. Geopolitical uncertainty weighs on the euro area.
Solutions proposed
  1. Monitor energy and inflation risks closely.
  2. Discuss immediate euro area priorities.
  3. Coordinate responses to geopolitical shocks.
Read the speech summary

1. Present challenges

After the 11 June Eurogroup meeting, President Kyriakos Pierrakakis said ministers looked at both urgent problems and the choices that decide how competitive Europe will be. The Middle East crisis is already felt, energy markets are still strained and the dangers for growth and prices need close watching. The Commission and the ECB presented assessments, and ministers took stock of national fiscal plans: uncertainty has a cost, so fiscal coordination, stability, credibility and consistency matter even more. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva joined the annual exchange on euro area policies and broadly shares the European assessment.

2. Energy, technology and financing

Energy supply, cost competitiveness, the climate transition and industrial strategy form a single problem, so Europe needs a strategy that cuts both costs and dependencies, through better interconnections, network investment and domestic sources. On technology, Europe has universities, research and talent; its only deficit is scale, because it often fails to turn innovations into global champions. Technological sovereignty means having the capabilities, skills and industrial base to make its own decisions, not isolation. All of this is financed by channelling European savings into productive investment through the savings and investments union. He welcomed new colleagues from Latvia and Slovenia and concluded that Europe must manage today's crisis and prepare for tomorrow at once.

Read full speech on consilium.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Vitai Ratanakorn Wiki · Bank of Thailand WikiPower, markets, and strategy in a changing global order

ContextOpening remarks by Vitai Ratanakorn, Governor of the Bank of Thailand, at the International Monetary Fund Economic Review Conference “Power, markets, and strategy in a changing global order”, Bangkok, 11 June 2026.

Why it mattersOpening an IMF conference in Bangkok, Thailand's Governor speaks for developing Asia, exposed to conflicts and fragmentation.

Problems raised
  1. Conflicts disrupt trade, investment and prices.
  2. The world is increasingly fragmented and uncertain.
  3. Developing Asian economies are exposed to these shocks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep openness and international cooperation.
  2. Strengthen resilience of people and businesses.
  3. Foster global dialogue through research conferences.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiMonetary Policy Decision

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 10 June 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Canada's June decision, explaining why it chose to look through the war's first effect on prices.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East conflict slows activity and raises inflation worldwide.
  2. Canadian housing and business investment are weak.
  3. High energy prices could turn into persistent inflation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Hold the policy rate at 2.25%.
  2. Look through the war's near-term impact on inflation.
  3. Stop high energy prices from becoming broad-based inflation.
Read the speech summary

1. Rates on hold amid a stagflation dilemma

Presenting the 10 June decision, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said the policy rate stayed at 2.25% as the Middle East conflict, higher energy prices and supply disruptions weigh on global growth and lift inflation, while US tariff uncertainty continues. Canadian GDP fell 0.1% in the first quarter, with consumer spending up 1.4% but government spending, housing and business investment weak; unemployment dropped to 6.6% but employment is little changed this year, and growth should resume in the second quarter while the economy stays in excess supply. CPI inflation rose to 2.8% in April on energy and the carbon-tax base effect, with no broad pass-through yet and core measures near 2%.

2. Risks and policy options

Oil is about ten dollars a barrel above the bank's assumption, so inflation should hover near 3% before easing toward 2%. Weak growth with rising inflation is a dilemma: raising rates could further slow the economy, easing risks entrenching inflation, so holding balances the risks. The bank will disregard the war's short-run impact but not let high energy prices become persistent inflation. If the US imposes major new trade restrictions, further cuts may be needed; if energy prices spread into generalised inflation, consecutive increases could follow. Structural shifts in trade, AI adoption and demographics complicate assessment.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MC
· Mathias Cormann Wiki · OECD Wiki2026 OECD Ministerial Council Meeting, Opening Remarks by OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann

ContextOpening Remarks by OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann on the occasion of the 2026 OECD Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris, France, on 3 June 2026.

Why it mattersThe OECD's yearly ministerial meeting sets the tone for rich-country economic policy; this opening warns against industrial policy turning into trade conflict.

Problems raised
  1. Industrial policy can distort markets and crowd out private investment.
  2. It can trigger costly trade conflicts.
  3. Some economies have let competitiveness gaps widen.
Solutions proposed
  1. Design industrial policy carefully to support growth.
  2. Stay committed to open markets and rules-based trade.
  3. Close productivity gaps to avoid disorderly adjustment.
Read the speech summary

1. A pressured economy and the return of industrial policy

Opening the OECD's 2026 ministerial council on getting industrial policy right, Secretary-General Mathias Cormann said the day's Economic Outlook shows global growth falling and inflation rising because the Middle East conflict disrupted energy and commodities, with fertiliser prices up and supply chains tested again, on top of low productivity growth, a fraying trading order, inequality, ageing and the investment needs of digital and climate transitions. Industrial policy has returned strongly, so the issue is how to act wisely, since it may boost growth, innovation and resilience, yet it may also warp markets, displace private capital, strain budgets and trigger costly trade disputes. Good policy works with markets and open, rules-based trade.

2. Imbalances and subsidies

Widening global imbalances need coordinated adjustment: deficit economies need to lift saving and cut spending, while surplus economies need to raise consumption and curb exports, and they should move from distorting subsidies to market-based approaches. The OECD's new MAGIC database tracks firm-level industrial subsidies in 15 sectors and 525 companies: support is widespread, mostly modest relative to revenue but significant for profit margins, and Chinese firms get substantially more, mainly through below-market borrowing from state-controlled banks, which has contributed to imbalances and strong positions in critical supply chains, a systemic risk.

3. Good policy and a second term

Good industrial policy starts with productivity: less red tape, skills, research, infrastructure and the digital and energy transitions. It also needs partners, because supply chains, AI, critical minerals and clean energy cannot be secured alone, while preserving developing economies' access to open markets. He urged pragmatism and compromise and, marking the start of his second term, listed priorities: productivity, fairer and more resilient trade, AI governance, climate best practice, enlargement and modernisation, calling the issue a trial of the open, market-driven model's ability to win out.

Read full speech on oecd.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' keynote speech at the ICMA AGM conference, 28 May 2026

ContextKeynote by the ESMA Chair in London at the Annual General Meeting and conference of ICMA, the international capital market association.

Why it mattersThe ESMA Chair argues for centralised supervision of Europe's main market infrastructures.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical tensions drive market volatility.
  2. Supervision of pan-European infrastructures is fragmented.
  3. Rules are complex and inconsistent.
Solutions proposed
  1. Centralise supervision of the main pan-European infrastructures.
  2. Simplify rules and improve proportionality.
  3. Strengthen risk-based supervision across ESMA and national authorities.
Read the speech summary

1. Resilient markets and the integration package

Speaking at the ICMA annual conference in London, ESMA Chair Verena Ross said that despite geopolitical volatility and a clouded outlook, capital markets have stayed resilient, which matters because they stabilise economies, while Europe needs deep, integrated markets to finance a competitive, low-carbon economy. ESMA fully backs the savings and investments union and the market integration and supervision package. Trading and post-trading remain fragmented along national lines; a proposed pan-European trading venue regime would let operators run several venues across member states, and the many securities depositories raise settlement costs and complicate cross-border deals, so connections between hubs, reciprocal links, T2S participation and clearing interoperability would help. For key pan-European infrastructures, centralised supervision would be more consistent and give a clearer view of risk, and ESMA, with fifteen years of experience, says it is ready, though building the capability will be a challenge.

2. Deeper markets, technology and simplification

She cited the EU consolidated tape, now taking shape, to improve transparency, and the move to one-day settlement on 11 October 2027, aligned between the EU and the UK, for which everyone should prepare. Tokenisation could streamline issuance, trading and settlement, embed compliance and give supervisors real-time tools, and the DLT pilot regime shows it working; the package should improve it without creating new fragmentation. Finally, accumulated detailed and duplicative rules create complexity, so ESMA is simplifying the policy framework, focusing supervision where risks are highest and reviewing reporting under market, derivatives and financing-transaction rules to report once and use many times.

Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiOverview of economic and financial developments in Italy

ContextConcluding remarks by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, at a meeting for the presentation of the Annual Report 2025 – 132nd Financial Year, Rome, 29 May 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Italy's yearly concluding remarks are Italy's main economic assessment; this one stresses small firm size and weak intangible investment.

Problems raised
  1. International trade may weaken under tariffs and Chinese competition.
  2. Italian firms are small and slow to adopt new technology.
  3. Too little investment in research, software and intangibles.
Solutions proposed
  1. Help firms scale up and innovate.
  2. Increase investment in intangible assets.
  3. Build on AI-driven investment to support growth.
Read the speech summary

1. A resilient year, then a new shock

In his concluding remarks on the Bank of Italy's annual report for 2025, the Governor noted that world output grew 3.4% in 2025, half a point above forecasts, despite wars and US tariffs. The United States grew over 2%, pushed by AI investment in data centres and by stock market gains that lifted consumption. China grew 5% by cutting export prices and finding new markets, a strategy that fails to address domestic deflation and invites protectionism. Easier monetary policy also helped. Markets showed signs of excess: high valuations, thin risk premiums, a search for yield in opaque segments, and rallies in gold, bitcoin and private credit, some of which reversed in 2025-26. The Gulf conflict then changed everything. Hormuz normally carries a fifth of global oil and LNG; its blockade lifted oil prices everywhere and gas prices in Europe and Asia but not in the United States. Fertiliser prices jumped, which will raise food prices early next year and could push tens of millions into extreme poverty. Inflation and short-term expectations are rising, and markets expect central banks to react, lifting rates at all maturities.

2. A fragile outlook

Energy costs cut household incomes and company margins, higher yields tighten financing and public debt limits support. Assuming a quick end to the conflict, the IMF expects world growth of 3.1% in 2026 and inflation of 4.4%; a longer war would be worse. Damage to energy infrastructure, high shipping and insurance costs and persistent uncertainty will weigh on spending. He stressed that today's risks are more numerous, more interconnected and harder to govern than before. Investors first fled to safety, lifting the dollar and pulling money from emerging markets; shares have since recovered, perhaps underestimating the damage, while rising long-term yields signal continuing tension. With heavy public debt and growing non-bank fragilities, small shocks can spread widely.

3. Trade and fragmentation

World trade grew 5% in 2025 as flows were rerouted and tariffs ended lower than announced; roughly half of the extra goods traffic was linked to AI equipment. Tariffs did not shrink the US goods deficit, as about 90% of their cost fell on American consumers and firms, while China's surpluses grew. The IMF warns that lasting barriers could slow trade growth below 3% in 2026. Governments rightly seek economic security, but indiscriminate fragmentation would raise costs, weaken supply chains and undermine cooperation, harming the citizens it aims to protect. The post-war rules-based system governed tensions for eighty years; its erosion through uneven rule enforcement, distorting industrial policies, imbalances and unequal gains must be addressed, and ties with countries that respect shared rules strengthened.

4. Global imbalances

Current account imbalances in 2025 reached their widest since the 2008 crisis. About two-thirds of all deficits are American, the result of large public deficits and low household saving; roughly a third of all surpluses are Chinese, since its model holds back consumption and favours exports; Europe's surplus reflects its difficulty in turning savings into innovative investment. America's net external debt equals about 90% of GDP. Large surpluses push global real rates down, encouraging risk-taking and borrowing, while deficit countries face sudden jumps in risk premiums. The energy shock may narrow imbalances temporarily but not their causes. A lasting fix requires a smaller US budget deficit, stronger Chinese consumption with less distorting industrial policy and more currency flexibility, and much more investment and a fully integrated single market in Europe; coordinated, the IMF estimates these steps would lift world GDP by 1%. Unmanaged imbalances tend to end in trade conflict, as before the 1985 Plaza Accord, or in financial crises, as before 2008.

5. Artificial intelligence and work

AI is spreading faster than earlier technologies. Five large US firms control about three-quarters of global computing power, most frontier models are American, China is catching up and Europe lags; yet the biggest gains usually go to those who adopt a technology, not those who invent it. AI is improving factory design, maintenance and logistics and speeding up drug discovery. For the first time it can perform highly cognitive tasks, but past innovations also created new occupations: six in ten US workers today do jobs that did not exist eighty years ago, and cheaper products can expand demand. The transition will hurt workers unable to switch and may widen inequality, so adoption by small firms, skills training and protection for exposed workers are essential. Work itself will change: in some jobs AI will assist people and free them for higher-value tasks, in others the human role will centre on interpreting results, exercising judgement and ensuring reliability, the parts automation cannot replace.

6. Europe: slower growth and the policy response

Euro area growth was 1.4% in 2025, about 1% excluding Ireland, held back in Germany and Italy by manufacturing hit by Chinese competition, while households kept saving. Inflation returned to 2%, allowing a 100 basis point cut in rates. Since March, confidence has dropped to 2022 levels, services weakened and banks tightened lending. ECB March projections showed growth of 0.9% in 2026 and inflation of 2.6% in the baseline, but a prolonged conflict could subtract a point of growth over two years and push inflation above 6%. Conditions are better than in 2021-22: rates are near neutral, demand is weaker, expectations are anchored and wages calm. Still, firms plan price rises and consumers expect more inflation, so the stance may need recalibrating to prevent a wage-price spiral; the June decision would depend on new projections, with no predetermined path. Acting in a timely and measured way, he said, protects household purchasing power, business confidence and the basis for durable growth, and the calibration would depend on how far energy costs filter into the wider basket and how strongly they depress spending and investment.

7. European policy gaps

Europe enters this unstable period with unresolved weaknesses that limit its growth and global weight. It faces dependence in defence, energy and technology and an incomplete single market in finance, energy and telecoms. Initiatives under the Competitiveness Compass, such as the Industrial Accelerator Act, a common European company form and the grids package, could help, but fewer than half of the planned proposals have been presented and under a quarter adopted. AI plans are delayed too, although the EU has rules, a strategy, investment programmes, rich industrial data and strong research; no call for tenders for AI gigafactories had been published by mid-May. Long negotiations, diluted compromises, uneven national application and unspent resources must be overcome, as credibility depends on delivery. Europe's savings flow abroad because capital markets remain national; beyond the savings and investments union, he called for a common European bond backed by shared fiscal capacity to provide a safe asset, fund common projects and strengthen the euro.

8. Italy: resilience but weak productivity

Since 2019 Italian GDP has risen over 6%, better than the euro area per person, driven by investment and exports, employment has risen strongly, and the country's net foreign position, deeply negative a decade ago, has turned positive at 15% of GDP, helped by prudent public finances. Growth slowed to 0.5% in 2025 as real wages lagged and Germany struggled, and the Gulf war may bring stagnation. Output per hour in the private sector has grown only 6% since 2000, against 13-34% in other large euro economies, while the working-age population is shrinking. Recovery plan spending exceeded €100 billion over 2021-25, about 30% of investment, adding nearly a point to annual growth and speeding up public tenders; private firms, which hold ample own funds, must now invest more in innovation and intangible assets.

9. AI adoption, skills and energy in Italy

About 30% of Italian firms use AI but only 5% intensively, below EU averages; adoption could add 0.2 to over 1 point a year to labour productivity, enough in the best case to offset demographic decline. He warned against repeating the 1990s, when slow adoption of information technology held back productivity for decades. Small firms face upfront costs, skill shortages, legal uncertainty and data protection concerns, and individual firms ignore the benefits that spread along supply chains, so he proposed stronger technology transfer, support for start-ups and venture capital, public procurement of innovation, AI in public administration and clear EU rules. Only 30% of people in their thirties hold a degree, 20% of young adults without a degree are out of both work and education, twice the rate elsewhere, more than 100 000 graduates emigrated in 2020-24 and education spending is a point of GDP below the EU average, a vicious circle of weak demand for skills and weak supply. Energy imports transfer wealth abroad; efficiency has improved, renewables reached 41% of electricity, grids are being expanded and new nuclear technologies deserve study, while support measures should stay temporary and targeted.

10. Banks and conclusion

Italian banks are profitable and well capitalised; smaller lenders are weaker, and recent problems at a few stemmed from poor governance, handled without contagion, and the exit of the weakest lenders has strengthened the sector. Large banks are spending on technology at levels comparable to European peers, while digital services attract younger customers; the Bank of Italy is attentive to less digitally skilled customers exposed to exclusion and scams. Mergers can help if competition, especially locally, is preserved, bringing Italy's banking structure closer to that of other large European countries and diversifying revenues; the five largest groups hold 68% of assets, less than in most peers. Lending has recovered but publicly guaranteed loans, over a fifth of business credit, should return to their targeted role, and equity finance must grow. IT incidents at banks rose 80% in 2023-25 and cyber incidents doubled; AI tools able to find system flaws quickly require stronger governance and DORA implementation. Recalling the 1946 choice of the Republic and of an open, rules-based world, he urged Europe to act together, Italy to invest in technology, skills and debt reduction, and governments to steer AI so that it serves people and gives young generations opportunities. Rules agreed at global level should protect competition, pluralism and the dignity of work, and success will be measured by the chances offered to young people to use their skills, be rewarded on merit and stay in the country.

Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FV
· François Villeroy de Galhau Wiki · Banque de France WikiEurope and China - a key economic relationship under the pressure of great uncertainty and growing imbalances

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Banque de France at the People's Bank of China in Beijing, before Governor Pan Gongsheng.

Why it mattersRaises Europe's trade imbalances with China face to face with Chinese officials, an unusually direct message.

Problems raised
  1. Energy shocks from the Middle East raise euro area inflation.
  2. Trade imbalances with China fuel tensions and fragmentation.
  3. European firms lack equity and venture capital.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep a close watch on energy-driven inflation scenarios.
  2. Address imbalances through dialogue between Europe and China.
  3. Speed up the Savings and Investments Union.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KP
· Kyriakos Pierrakakis Wiki · Eurogroup WikiRemarks by Kyriakos Pierrakakis following the Eurogroup meeting of 22 May 2026

ContextPress conference by the Eurogroup President after the monthly meeting of euro area finance ministers on 22 May 2026.

Why it mattersEuro area ministers' common line on geopolitical and energy risks during the spring of the Middle East energy shock.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical tensions threaten stability.
  2. Energy shocks affect Europe.
  3. Cooperation is under strain.
Solutions proposed
  1. Cooperate within a multilateral framework.
  2. Ensure stability and resilience.
  3. Pursue shared prosperity.
Read the speech summary

1. Economy under strain

After the euro-area finance ministers met in Cyprus, Kyriakos Pierrakakis describes a demanding moment. Instability in the Middle East pressures energy markets and supply chains, and the Hormuz situation disrupts oil, gas, fertiliser and helium. The Commission now projects growth slightly under one percent this year and about 1.2% in 2027, weaker than before yet far from recession, with renewed but milder inflation pressure than in 2022.

2. Policy balance

Europe must protect fiscal stability while easing strain on households and firms, using measures that are temporary, targeted and tailored. He credits past energy adaptation with cutting the crisis impact by about 12% according to the IMF, and stresses coordination with partners after G7 talks led by France.

3. Housing and the digital euro

Ministers held a substantive talk on housing affordability, which affects productivity, mobility and inequality, agreeing no single fix suits all countries. They also met a European Parliament committee chair on digital euro legislation, which he wants finished by year end, calling the project vital for sovereignty and the euro's international role, deliverable by 2029.

Read full speech on consilium.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiWar, oil shocks and trade restrictions - geoeconomics and implications for Asia

ContextSpecial remarks by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the ASB (Asia School of Business)-SEACEN (South East Asian Central Banks) Policy Roundtable, Asia School of Business, Kuala Lumpur, 15 May 2026.

Why it mattersMalaysia's Governor gives an Asian view of war, oil and tariffs, and of how to support households without wrecking public finances.

Problems raised
  1. A chain of shocks, from COVID to war and tariffs, keeps hitting economies.
  2. The Middle East conflict drives an oil shock.
  3. Energy subsidies can strain public finances.
Solutions proposed
  1. Build policy frameworks that resist repeated stress.
  2. Target support to the vulnerable while keeping energy-saving incentives.
  3. Rebuild buffers, speed up reforms and deepen regional cooperation.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FK
· Fatih Karahan Wiki · Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye WikiRecent economic and financial developments in Turkey

ContextPress briefing in Istanbul by the Governor of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye presenting the second Inflation Report of 2026.

Why it mattersTurkey's central bank updates its inflation path and explains how protectionism and energy prices slow disinflation.

Problems raised
  1. Protectionism and geopolitical events threaten disinflation.
  2. Rising energy prices add new inflation risks.
  3. Frequent supply shocks make inflation stickier.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep monetary policy tight enough to bring inflation down.
  2. Aim for 9% inflation by end-2028, then the 5% target.
  3. Assess risks to inflation expectations with an integrated approach.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiAfrica's Golden Future

ContextRemarks at the Africa Forward Summit in Kenya, with Presidents Ruto and Macron; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersSays closing half the governance gap with emerging markets could lift sub-Saharan output by up to 20 percent within a decade, and reports IMF concessional lending to Africa rising to $36 billion.

Problems raised
  1. Global imbalances divert capital away from Africa, where growth potential is highest.
  2. Debt burdens and weak investor trust limit Africa's access to global savings.
  3. Trade barriers keep African economies fragmented and less competitive.
Solutions proposed
  1. Build strong institutions, fight corruption and cut red tape to win investor trust.
  2. Remove tariff and non-tariff barriers under the continental free trade area.
  3. Restructure unsustainable debt and shift from borrowing towards equity financing.
Read the speech summary

1. Africa as the next growth engine

At the Africa Forward Summit in Kenya, Georgieva called Africa the place where the world will find its next growth engine, but in a world of widening imbalances: export-led economies squeeze room in supply chains, big deficit countries absorb a large share of capital, and the sharpest gap is demographic, with capital in ageing societies and growth potential in young ones.

2. What countries should do

Africa should use its own savings better and attract the vast global pools of equity and bond savings that now avoid the fastest-growing regions, through credible policy, action against corruption and less red tape. Removing trade barriers under the continental free trade area could raise income per head by over ten percent. Unsustainable debt should be restructured or reprofiled, unproductive borrowing avoided and financing moved from debt towards equity through deeper capital markets.

3. What the IMF does

Concessional lending to Africa has risen from eight to thirty-six billion dollars, helped by channelling reserve assets, and programmes are run as partnerships. The Fund is reforming the debt architecture, has added a third African seat on its board and is pushing for fairer representation. Good policies pay: closing half the gap with emerging markets in regulation and governance could raise sub-Saharan output by up to twenty percent within a decade.

Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KP
· Kyriakos Pierrakakis Wiki · Eurogroup Wiki“A message for Europe Day” by Kyriakos Pierrakakis, President of the Eurogroup

ContextWritten message by the Eurogroup President published for Europe Day, 9 May 2026.

Why it mattersMakes the case for European unity as a condition for economic weight in a fragmenting world.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical rivalry challenges Europe.
  2. Technology disrupts economies.
  3. Economic fragmentation grows.
Solutions proposed
  1. Avoid nostalgia and complacency.
  2. Strengthen Europe's economy.
  3. Act together as Europeans.
Read full speech on consilium.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
LK
· Lesetja Kganyago Wiki · South African Reserve Bank WikiOne crisis after another - shocks, imbalances and resilience in the global economy

ContextAddress by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank, at the PSG Think Big Series, Sun City, 6 May 2026.

Why it mattersSouth Africa's Governor gives a global view of serial crises, high debt and imbalances, naming what surplus and deficit countries should each do.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical crises follow one another.
  2. Sovereign debt is high and rising, with new spending needs.
  3. Global imbalances and frothy asset markets add risk.
Solutions proposed
  1. Raise consumption in surplus countries.
  2. Cut government borrowing in deficit countries.
  3. Let currencies adjust and favour consumers over producers.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiStable and strong in turbulent times – Europe's responses to global challenges

ContextSpeech by the Bundesbank President to the Lions Club Frankfurt-Am Leonhardsbrunn, on the eve of Europe Day.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank President's broad view of the decade's shocks and of what monetary policy can and cannot do.

Problems raised
  1. Four major upheavals hit this decade, from the pandemic to war.
  2. The Middle East conflict pushes oil and gas prices up.
  3. Monetary policy alone cannot meet these challenges.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep monetary policy focused on price stability.
  2. Improve conditions so private firms invest and innovate.
  3. Give a common European response to global challenges.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiRelease of the Monetary Policy Report

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 29 April 2026.

Why it mattersStates explicitly the conditions under which the Bank of Canada would consider lowering rates.

Problems raised
  1. US tariffs weigh on exports and investment.
  2. Higher gasoline and food prices lift near-term expectations.
  3. High oil prices could become generalised inflation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Hold the policy rate at 2.25%.
  2. Cut rates if new US trade restrictions hit growth.
  3. Prevent energy prices from turning into persistent inflation.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiThe digital euro - anchoring Europe's strategic autonomy in a digital future

ContextKeynote speech by Joachim Nagel, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the House of the Euro, Brussels, 22 April 2026.

Why it mattersPresents the digital euro as a question of European strategic autonomy.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical change raises payment sovereignty questions.
  2. Euro area payment solutions are fragmented.
  3. Europe relies on global payment providers.
Solutions proposed
  1. Introduce the digital euro.
  2. Keep central bank money relevant in a digital economy.
  3. Adopt a firm legal framework for the digital euro.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
HS
· Hyun Song Shin Wiki · Bank of Korea WikiInaugural address

ContextInaugural address by Hyun Song Shin, Governor of the Bank of Korea, Seoul, 21 April 2026.

Why it mattersThe new Bank of Korea Governor's first speech in office, setting out his priorities.

Problems raised
  1. Rising oil prices push inflation up and growth down.
  2. Financial market volatility and imbalances persist.
  3. Tariffs are reshaping trade.
Solutions proposed
  1. Serve the economy with responsible monetary policy.
  2. Watch financial imbalances closely.
  3. Draw on international experience to guide the Bank of Korea.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CY
· Chang Yong Rhee Wiki · Bank of Korea WikiFarewell address

ContextFarewell address by Chang Yong Rhee, Governor of the Bank of Korea, on his departure from the Bank of Korea, Seoul, 20 April 2026.

Why it mattersThe outgoing Bank of Korea Governor reflects on four years of shocks and leaves a list of structural reforms.

Problems raised
  1. The past four years brought unexpected shocks.
  2. Tariffs and Middle East tensions drove the exchange rate up.
  3. Korea needs deep structural reforms.
Solutions proposed
  1. Introduce Korean-style forward guidance.
  2. Publish structural reform reports.
  3. Reform labour markets, education and pensions.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
PH
· Pablo Hernández de Cos Wiki · Bank for International Settlements WikiGlobal economic outlook, financial stability risks, stablecoins and central bank independence

ContextInterview with Pablo Hernández de Cos, General Manager of the BIS, with Japan's The Nikkei (in Japanese) and Nikkei Asia (in English), conducted by Mikio Sugeno, Setsuo Otsuka and Takero Minami, Tokyo, 20 April 2026.

Why it mattersA wide-ranging BIS interview with the Nikkei covering the war's economic impact, non-bank risks and stablecoins.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East war raises inflation and lowers growth.
  2. Risky financing has moved to non-bank financial institutions.
  3. Stablecoins cannot guarantee conversion at par under stress.
Solutions proposed
  1. Review post-crisis reforms to improve the framework.
  2. Apply consistent regulation to risky non-bank activities.
  3. Avoid fragmentation of payment systems and rules.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiIMFC Statement

ContextWritten statement by Christine Lagarde for the 53rd meeting of the IMF's International Monetary and Financial Committee.

Why it mattersThe ECB's official written position for the IMF spring meetings, summing up its view of the euro area and the world economy.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical and trade tensions weigh on growth.
  2. The Middle East war raises inflation and lowers growth.
  3. Non-bank financial institutions pose risks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Base rate decisions on the inflation outlook and transmission.
  2. Strengthen the policy framework for non-banks.
  3. Deepen international cooperation.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AM
· Ayman M Al-Sayari · Saudi Central Bank WikiSpeech - Imbalances Discussion Session

ContextIntervention by the Governor of the Saudi Central Bank in the session on global imbalances at the first 2026 meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, in Washington.

Why it mattersA large surplus economy's view on what drives global imbalances and how to correct them.

Problems raised
  1. Excessive global imbalances can lead to disorderly adjustment.
  2. They spread through trade and financial channels.
  3. Distortive industrial policies misallocate resources.
Solutions proposed
  1. Identify the real drivers of imbalances.
  2. Pay attention to non-market practices and tax frictions.
  3. Improve data and country-specific analysis.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AM
· Ayman M Al-Sayari · Saudi Central Bank WikiStatement - International Monetary and Financial Committee

ContextWritten statement by the Governor of the Saudi Central Bank to the IMF's International Monetary and Financial Committee, in Washington.

Why it mattersSaudi Arabia's statement to the IMF committee, comparing the size of the new supply shock with the post-pandemic energy shock.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East war tests the global economy and multilateralism.
  2. The supply shock may exceed the post-pandemic energy shock.
  3. Growth is weak, debt high and policy space limited.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep the IMF focused on its core stability mandate.
  2. Use forward-looking, credible policy frameworks.
  3. Build resilience through structural reforms, as Saudi Arabia did.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiEvolving roles and responsibilities of central banks in a changing landscape

ContextKeynote address by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the Central Banking Meetings, Kuala Lumpur, 31 March 2026.

Why it mattersMalaysia's Governor on how central banks should keep their mandate while adapting to conflict, digital change and climate.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical conflict and trade fragmentation reshape the world.
  2. Digital change and climate pressures add challenges.
  3. Tightening can be misunderstood by the public in the short run.
Solutions proposed
  1. Stay true to the mandate while remaining agile.
  2. Explain central bank actions clearly.
  3. Build resilience for a changing world.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FV
· François Villeroy de Galhau Wiki · Banque de France WikiLittle time left to wake up - can we reconcile Europe with speed?

ContextSpeech (virtually) by François Villeroy de Galhau, Governor of the Bank of France, at the 2026 Eurofi High Level Seminar, Nicosia, 27 March 2026.

Why it mattersA sharp call from the Banque de France Governor for Europe to act faster on capital markets, with clear deadlines.

Problems raised
  1. Market fragmentation blocks EU firms from scaling up.
  2. Access to capital is a key obstacle.
  3. Europe fears the risks of action more than those of inaction.
Solutions proposed
  1. Act fast with clear deadlines on reforms.
  2. Unify capital markets to finance growth.
  3. Seize the moment as US policy becomes less predictable.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
UL
· Ursula von der Leyen Wiki · European Commission WikiKeynote speech by President von der Leyen at the European Australian Business Council event

ContextKeynote by the President of the European Commission to the European Australian Business Council in Sydney.

Why it mattersSignals a closer EU-Australia economic and security partnership, with trade and critical raw materials at its core.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical tensions threaten trade and prosperity.
  2. Hybrid threats and cyber attacks are rising.
  3. Partners need closer cooperation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Deepen EU-Australia economic partnership.
  2. Pool expertise on hybrid threats and cybersecurity.
  3. Cooperate on security and trade.
Read full speech on ec.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AB
· Andrew Bailey Wiki · Bank of England WikiOral evidence: Bank of England Monetary Policy Reports, HC 419

ContextHearing of the Governor and members of the Monetary Policy Committee before the House of Commons Treasury Committee on the Monetary Policy Report.

Why it mattersMPs question the Bank of England's rate-setters on the pace of rate cuts as the energy shock begins.

Problems raised
  1. Energy shocks historically derailed inflation targeting.
  2. The pace of rate cuts is debated.
  3. Tariff effects remain uncertain.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep sight of the path towards 3% rates if data allow.
  2. Weigh slower cuts now against sharper cuts later.
  3. Watch global shocks closely.
Read full speech on committees.parliament.uk ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiRelease of the Monetary Policy Report

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 18 March 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Canada's March decision, the first after the Middle East war broke out, explaining why it looked through the immediate price impact.

Problems raised
  1. US trade policy and geopolitics create uncertainty.
  2. The economy is in excess supply and grows slowly.
  3. The Middle East conflict widens possible outcomes.
Solutions proposed
  1. Hold the policy rate at 2.25%.
  2. Look through the war's immediate impact on inflation.
  3. Prevent high energy prices from becoming persistent inflation.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
MC
· Mathias Cormann Wiki · OECD WikiKeynote address to the EU Tax Symposium: The Continuing Value of Multilateral Tax Co-operation - What Next for OECD Tax Work?

ContextOECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann gave a Keynote Address at the EU Tax Symposium on 17 March 2026 in Brussels, Belgium.

Why it mattersThe OECD chief argues for keeping international tax cooperation alive, including on taxing the digital economy.

Problems raised
  1. Governments face growing fiscal pressures.
  2. Taxation of the digital economy is unresolved.
  3. Unilateral tax measures risk fragmentation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep multilateral tax cooperation.
  2. Return to talks on digital economy taxation.
  3. Modernise tax rules for new work patterns.
Read full speech on oecd.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiShaping Asia's Future

ContextOpening remarks at the Asia in 2050 Conference in Bangkok, co-hosted with the Bank of Thailand; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersPraises Asia's last quarter century and sets three challenges to 2050: AI productivity, jobs and ageing, and trade; estimates closer regional trade links could add 1.8 percent to Asian output.

Problems raised
  1. The new Middle East conflict threatens energy security and confidence in Asia.
  2. AI will squeeze middle-skill and entry-level jobs while Asia ages faster than any other region.
  3. Trade policy shocks turn openness into a vulnerability for export-led economies.
Solutions proposed
  1. Invest in digital infrastructure, skills and sound AI guardrails to lift productivity.
  2. Tailor policy to demographics: labor participation where societies are old, job creation where young.
  3. Push regional integration by cutting nontariff barriers and building an internal market.
Read the speech summary

1. Uncertainty as the new normal

At a Bangkok conference on Asia in 2050, Georgieva said the new Middle East conflict, whose regional and global effects the IMF is quantifying, puts energy security and confidence at stake for most of Asia. Uncertainty is now the permanent condition rather than a passing phase, so governments and firms need strategy, financial strength and above all agility, and should concentrate on what lies within their own control.

2. A golden quarter-century

Since 2000 the region built policy frameworks, financial oversight, reserves and trust, which brought stability, low inflation, investment, private-sector growth and poverty reduction on a vast scale. Asia now produces two-thirds of global growth and nearly forty percent of world trade.

3. First challenge: productivity through AI

AI could add up to eight tenths of a point to annual growth in Asia, provided large public and private investment in digital infrastructure and skills, fewer regulatory barriers, deeper stock and bond markets and sensible guardrails. Singapore tops the IMF's preparedness index, China and Korea lead in adoption, India is democratising access and Japan uses robotics; several Southeast Asian economies and Korea have out-of-court debt restructuring.

4. Second challenge: people

AI will not help everyone: middle and entry-level jobs are most at risk, which matters for young people, so workers must be taught to keep learning. Asia will age faster than any region, with the number aged over sixty-five doubling by 2050, yet conditions differ: Japan is old, China and Korea are ageing quickly, India, Bangladesh and parts of Southeast Asia stay young, so some need higher participation and others more jobs.

5. Third challenge: trade and integration

Openness can be a weakness, but trade finds a way around barriers, and Asia can act alone through regional integration: lowering nontariff barriers could raise regional output by about 1.8 percent in the long run. She urged an ambition beyond trade agreements, towards an internal market like the European one, helped by Asia's lead in digital payments, which will feature at the Annual Meetings.

Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiPresentation of the Deutsche Bundesbank's Annual Report 2025

ContextIntroductory statement by Joachim Nagel, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the press conference presenting the Annual Report 2025, Frankfurt am Main, 5 March 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank's yearly results presentation, explaining its accumulated loss and its view of the war's impact on Germany.

Problems raised
  1. The Middle East war's impact depends on its duration.
  2. Germany faces many economic challenges.
  3. The Bundesbank has an accumulated loss.
Solutions proposed
  1. Decide carefully whether policy needs to change.
  2. Rely on Germany's institutions, research and skills.
  3. Use future profits to cover losses and rebuild provisions.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiTechnology, fragmentation and the new uncertainty

ContextAnnual Global Risk Lecture by Christine Lagarde in honour of Robert Mundell, organised by Johns Hopkins University in Bologna, Italy.

Why it mattersA lecture in Robert Mundell's honour in which the ECB President explains how technology creates new strategic chokepoints.

Problems raised
  1. The world has moved from measurable risk to deep uncertainty.
  2. Technology creates new strategic chokepoints.
  3. Fragmentation threatens cooperation.
Solutions proposed
  1. Adopt a common strategy with allies on supply chains.
  2. Coordinate export controls and joint research.
  3. Keep minimum cooperation even with rivals.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiIntroductory remarks – conference "Laying the groundwork for jobs in Africa: core infrastructure and business environments"

ContextIntroductory remarks by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, at the conference "Laying the goundwork for jobs in Africa: core infrastructure and business environments", organised by the Bank of Italy, Rome, 4 March 2026.

Why it mattersStresses that business rules and institutions matter as much as roads and power for creating jobs in Africa.

Problems raised
  1. Africa's young people need jobs.
  2. Protectionism and geopolitics add uncertainty.
  3. Infrastructure without regulatory certainty fails to attract funding.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen infrastructure and human capital.
  2. Combine physical investment with regulatory reform.
  3. Turn research and dialogue into concrete action.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiCentral banking in an age of geoeconomic fragmentation and global uncertainty

ContextSpeech by the Bundesbank President at the 157th Baden-Badener Unternehmer Gespräche, a German business leaders' forum.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank President's view of German weakness and financial stability risks from US tariffs, just as the war began.

Problems raised
  1. Geoeconomic risks and uncertainty are very high.
  2. German growth is weak.
  3. US tariff hikes and geopolitics threaten financial stability.
Solutions proposed
  1. Expect modest growth recovery in Germany.
  2. Monitor risks to financial stability closely.
  3. Defend the benefits of the division of labour and trade.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FP
· Fabio Panetta Wiki · Banca d'Italia WikiTrade and finance in a fragmented world

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Italy at the 32nd ASSIOM FOREX Congress, the yearly meeting of Italian market professionals.

Why it mattersCovers public debt, global imbalances and Europe's fragmented capital market from Italy's point of view.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical and trade tensions are high.
  2. Public debt and external imbalances are elevated.
  3. Vulnerabilities build up in financial markets.
Solutions proposed
  1. Strengthen the EU's capacity to decide and act.
  2. Build a genuine European capital market.
  3. Pursue trade agreements and cooperation.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiPreparing for geoeconomic fragmentation

ContextOpening remarks by Christine Lagarde at a roundtable on geoeconomic shifts and dependencies at the Munich Security Conference.

Why it mattersTreats trade dependencies as a security risk that should be stress-tested.

Problems raised
  1. Trade has become a security issue.
  2. Some products are hard to diversify or replace.
  3. Market stress could cause fire sales of euro assets.
Solutions proposed
  1. Stress-test the effects of cut-off supply.
  2. Build domestic capacity in critical sectors.
  3. Prepare the ECB for a more volatile environment.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiEuropean monetary policy challenges in the new geopolitical environment

ContextDinner speech by Joachim Nagel, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the Euro50 Group meeting, London, 12 February 2026.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank President on more volatile inflation, stablecoins and threats to central bank independence.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical risk is near 2022 levels.
  2. Inflation may become more volatile.
  3. Stablecoins and pressure on independence challenge central banks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Prepare monetary policy for inflation volatility.
  2. Protect central bank independence.
  3. Address the rise of stablecoins.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FK
· Fatih Karahan Wiki · Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye WikiRecent economic and financial developments in Turkey

ContextPress briefing in Istanbul by the Governor of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye presenting the first Inflation Report of 2026.

Why it mattersExplains Turkey's meeting-by-meeting approach to rates while inflation stays high.

Problems raised
  1. Food inflation is volatile.
  2. Growth is slower than before tariffs.
  3. Inflation uncertainty remains.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep a tight, inflation-focused policy.
  2. Decide meeting by meeting.
  3. Rely on improving risk indicators as inflation falls.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
UL
· Ursula von der Leyen Wiki · European Commission WikiSpeech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament plenary debate on urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living – from the Draghi report to reality

ContextSpeech by the President of the European Commission at a European Parliament plenary debate on EU competitiveness, from the Draghi report to concrete action.

Why it mattersThe Commission President presents the '28th regime' for companies, a central idea for simplifying business across the EU.

Problems raised
  1. Europe's competitiveness is lagging.
  2. Regulation is fragmented and complex.
  3. Cost of living is high.
Solutions proposed
  1. Propose a '28th regime' for companies.
  2. Crack down on gold-plating and fragmentation.
  3. Base proposals on robust economic analysis.
Read full speech on ec.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiEuropean Parliament plenary debate on the ECB Annual Report

ContextSpeech by Christine Lagarde at the European Parliament's plenary debate on the ECB Annual Report.

Why it mattersThe ECB's yearly accountability exercise before elected representatives.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical tensions and policy uncertainty persist.
  2. Europe needs more resilience and competitiveness.
  3. Critical supply chains are exposed.
Solutions proposed
  1. Base decisions on data and the inflation outlook.
  2. Coordinate European research and development.
  3. Support strategic sectors and de-risk supply chains.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiPolicies Amid a Reset of the International Trade and Financial Systems

ContextRemarks at the second AlUla Conference for Emerging Market Economies, hosted by Saudi Arabia; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersCredits emerging markets with stronger central banks and fiscal rules, notes their growth near 4 percent against 1.5 percent in advanced economies, and sets two priorities: private-sector growth and integration.

Problems raised
  1. Growth in emerging markets still lags pre-pandemic trends.
  2. Fiscal buffers are depleted and debt is rising just as more shocks loom.
  3. Shifting alliances and trade patterns disrupt established trade routes.
Solutions proposed
  1. Cut red tape, deepen financial markets and strengthen institutions to unleash private-sector growth.
  2. Help young people develop the skills needed for tomorrow's jobs.
  3. Step up regional and cross-regional integration.
Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
AR
· Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour · Bank Negara Malaysia WikiThe future of international monetary system and the role of Asia

ContextOpening remarks by Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Governor of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia), at the SEACEN Policy Summit, Kuala Lumpur, 5 February 2026.

Why it mattersMalaysia's Governor gives an Asian view on the international monetary system, local currencies and stablecoin risks.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitics and policy uncertainty weigh on the monetary system.
  2. Stablecoins can speed up runs and fragment payments.
  3. No country can face these challenges alone.
Solutions proposed
  1. Diversify through local currency frameworks.
  2. Build regional payment connectivity and safety nets.
  3. Make systems interoperable across borders.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KG
· Kristalina Georgieva Wiki · International Monetary Fund WikiRe-energizing Europe

ContextRemarks at the European Commission's College seminar on competitiveness in Leuven; the IMF advises and lends to its 191 members to keep the global economy stable.

Why it mattersArgues Europe's convergence engine is stalling and urges a finished single market, a 28th corporate regime and a savings and investment union, estimating EU productivity could rise 20 percent.

Problems raised
  1. Europe's economy and productivity are falling behind the United States.
  2. Regulatory fragmentation makes cross-border trade, labor mobility and energy costly.
  3. A banking and capital market split into 27 pieces keeps risk capital short.
Solutions proposed
  1. Complete the single market, with a 28th pan-EU legal regime adopted as a Regulation.
  2. Integrate energy grids and issue more joint EU debt for shared public goods.
  3. Build a unified savings and investment union and set a hard deadline.
Read the speech summary

1. A stalling convergence engine

Speaking to the Commission's competitiveness seminar in Leuven, Georgieva said Europe's convergence engine is stalling because the single market is unfinished and complacency about competing has set in, while threats mount: Russia's war to the east and a dented transatlantic alliance to the west, where a trade breakdown could cost the Union around 0.3 percent of output on top of half a point already lost.

2. Three hard facts

Europe's economy is shrinking in relative terms, since EU output once matched America's; it has lost its productivity lead in both technology and other sectors; and its firms are less competitive and struggle to grow, with promising startups moving abroad. The core objective must therefore be much faster productivity growth, through national structural reforms and completion of the single market.

3. Where regulation and fragmentation bite

Regulatory barriers to trade inside the Union are two to three times those between American states, moving workers is roughly eight times costlier, energy costs about double American levels, and a banking system split into twenty-seven pieces leaves a sixty-trillion-euro financial system holding timid money. She called for a deep regulatory clean-up, an end to national gold-plating, a 28th corporate regime created by Regulation rather than Directive, easier labour mobility through recognised qualifications, portable social security and flexible housing, one energy blueprint with interconnectors and faster permits, more joint EU borrowing for shared goods such as defence, and one unified financial system.

4. The payoff and three practical steps

Cutting internal frictions to American levels could raise EU productivity by about twenty percent, and Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain show reforms pay. She also backed rules-based trade and recent deals with Mercosur and India. Her three suggestions: make the single market a single-minded obsession under one empowered coordinator, set a hard deadline and plan backwards, and replace the image of a regulatory superpower with one that sweeps away obsolete rules, using AI for the clean-up.

Read full speech on imf.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
UL
· Ursula von der Leyen Wiki · European Commission WikiSpeech by President von der Leyen at the EU-India Business Forum

ContextSpeech by the President of the European Commission at the EU-India Business Forum, alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Why it mattersComes as the EU and India deepen economic ties, with a trade agreement in view.

Problems raised
  1. Economic uncertainty and fragmentation are rising.
  2. Two-way investment needs a secure framework.
  3. Industrial cooperation is limited.
Solutions proposed
  1. Choose cooperation with India over fragmentation.
  2. Provide a secure investment framework.
  3. Boost industrial cooperation in strategic sectors.
Read full speech on ec.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
UL
· Ursula von der Leyen Wiki · European Commission WikiSpecial Address by President von der Leyen at the World Economic Forum

ContextSpecial address by the President of the European Commission at the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos.

Why it mattersThe Commission President's yearly Davos address, presenting Europe's answer to geopolitical shocks.

Problems raised
  1. Geopolitical shocks challenge Europe.
  2. Security and economy are linked.
  3. Europe must invest more.
Solutions proposed
  1. Turn shocks into opportunities for Europe.
  2. Step up investment.
  3. Strengthen security partnerships with the UK, Canada and others.
Read full speech on ec.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KP
· Kyriakos Pierrakakis Wiki · Eurogroup WikiRemarks by Kyriakos Pierrakakis following the Eurogroup meeting of 19 January 2026

ContextPress conference by the Eurogroup President after the first Eurogroup meeting with Bulgaria as the euro area's newest member.

Why it mattersEuro area ministers on tariffs, overcapacity and critical dependencies at the start of 2026.

Problems raised
  1. Tariffs and overcapacity threaten growth.
  2. Russia's war continues.
  3. Critical dependencies in technology and minerals.
Solutions proposed
  1. Keep dialogue open.
  2. Ensure unity and coordination.
  3. Reduce critical dependencies.
Read full speech on consilium.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
PS
· Paul S. Atkins · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission WikiRemarks at the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange

ContextSpeech by Paul S. Atkins, Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Why it mattersA rare international speech by the SEC Chair, in Tel Aviv, on market resilience under geopolitical stress.

Problems raised
  1. Israel's market faces geopolitical uncertainty.
  2. Markets must align with international practice.
  3. Investment must keep flowing in crises.
Solutions proposed
  1. Align trading with international markets.
  2. Preserve Israel's innovation culture.
  3. Deepen US-Israel market cooperation.
Read full speech on sec.gov ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KU
· Kazuo Ueda Wiki · Bank of Japan WikiToward the achievement of the price stability target accompanied by wage increases

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Japan to the councillors of Keidanren, the Japan Business Federation, in Tokyo.

Why it mattersExplains why rates can keep rising as wages increase, a key message for Japanese firms.

Problems raised
  1. US tariffs weighed on corporate profits.
  2. Wage growth must accompany price stability.
  3. Firms need staff able to use AI.
Solutions proposed
  1. Raise the policy rate as the outlook improves.
  2. Support reskilling and human resource development.
  3. Work with the government's economic package to promote wages and investment.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
TM
· Tiff Macklem Wiki · Bank of Canada WikiMonetary Policy Decision

ContextOpening statement by Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada and Carolyn Rogers, Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, at the press conference following the monetary policy decision, Ottawa, Ontario, 10 December 2025.

Why it mattersThe Bank of Canada's December decision, holding rates as tariffs hit key Canadian industries.

Problems raised
  1. US tariffs hurt key Canadian sectors.
  2. Trade uncertainty weighs on investment.
  3. The economy is going through a structural transition.
Solutions proposed
  1. Hold the policy rate at 2.25%.
  2. Keep the rate at the low end of neutral to support the economy.
  3. Keep inflation pressures contained.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiHearing of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament

ContextStatement by Christine Lagarde before the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as part of the regular Monetary Dialogue.

Why it mattersThe ECB President's end-2025 report to MEPs on the outlook and on what other policies must do for growth.

Problems raised
  1. Technological, geopolitical and structural changes reshape the economy.
  2. Trade policies remain volatile.
  3. Financial market sentiment could worsen.
Solutions proposed
  1. Base rate decisions on the inflation outlook and transmission.
  2. Let other policies lead on resilience and competitiveness.
  3. Build Europe's internal economic strength.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
KU
· Kazuo Ueda Wiki · Bank of Japan WikiJapan's economy and monetary policy

ContextSpeech by the Governor of the Bank of Japan to business leaders of the Tokai region in Nagoya.

Why it mattersRead as a signal of a possible rate increase, after the Governor gathered firms' views on wages.

Problems raised
  1. Japan's exporters were exposed to US tariffs.
  2. The outlook was uncertain.
  3. Regional economies depend on exports.
Solutions proposed
  1. Listen closely to regional business leaders.
  2. Adjust policy as the baseline becomes more likely.
  3. Watch US policy developments.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
JN
· Joachim Nagel Wiki · Deutsche Bundesbank WikiReducing complexity, preserving stability - outlook for European banking supervision

ContextSpeech by the Bundesbank President at the Bavarian Banking Day in Munich.

Why it mattersThe Bundesbank President explains how to simplify bank rules without weakening capital.

Problems raised
  1. Banking rules have become too complex.
  2. Geoeconomic fragmentation raises risks.
  3. Lax regulation once caused the global financial crisis.
Solutions proposed
  1. Simplify rules without deregulating.
  2. Keep capital strong for stability.
  3. Detail the proposed simplification measures.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
PH
· Pablo Hernández de Cos Wiki · Bank for International Settlements WikiFiscal threats in a changing global financial system

ContextLecture by Pablo Hernández de Cos, General Manager of the BIS, London School of Economics, London, 27 November 2025.

Why it mattersA BIS lecture on record public debt and the growing role of non-banks in government bond markets.

Problems raised
  1. Sovereign debt is at post-war highs.
  2. Non-banks play a bigger role in bond markets.
  3. This creates new financial stability risks.
Solutions proposed
  1. Use a careful mix of fiscal, monetary and prudential tools.
  2. Address domestic and international aspects together.
  3. Strengthen resilience of sovereign bond markets.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
FV
· François Villeroy de Galhau Wiki · Banque de France WikiThe competitiveness of the banking sector - a few insights into a major challenge for France and Europe

ContextOpening speech by the Governor of the Banque de France at the 2025 ACPR Conference in Paris, for the French supervisor's 15th anniversary.

Why it mattersThe Banque de France Governor on why European banks lose ground and how payments like Wero fit in.

Problems raised
  1. European banks lack competitiveness.
  2. Complex rules and market fragmentation hold them back.
  3. Europe lacks a strategic vision for finance.
Solutions proposed
  1. Support European payment solutions like Wero.
  2. Strengthen investment banking to finance AI, energy and defence.
  3. Remove regulatory and fragmentation obstacles.
Read full speech on bis.org ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' Keynote speech at the Financial Services Ireland Annual Dinner, 20 November 2025

ContextAfter-dinner keynote by the ESMA Chair at the Financial Services Ireland Annual Dinner in Dublin.

Why it mattersThe ESMA Chair explains in Dublin why some firms would benefit from a single EU supervisor.

Problems raised
  1. Supervision of key firms is split among authorities.
  2. Geopolitics, technology and demographics create pressure.
  3. Fiscal and social pressures collide.
Solutions proposed
  1. Give significant firms a single central supervisor.
  2. Target centralisation where it improves efficiency.
  3. Build capital markets fit for future challenges.
Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
CL
· Christine Lagarde Wiki · European Central Bank WikiFrom resilience to strength: unleashing Europe’s domestic market

ContextSpeech by Christine Lagarde at the 35th Frankfurt European Banking Congress.

Why it mattersThe ECB President argues that Europe's internal barriers cost more than US tariffs, a widely quoted point.

Problems raised
  1. The post-war global order is fracturing.
  2. US tariffs cut euro area growth.
  3. Internal EU barriers act like tariffs.
Solutions proposed
  1. Reduce internal barriers to raise intra-EU trade.
  2. Move from soft coordination to real harmonisation.
  3. Build strength on the domestic market.
Read full speech on ecb.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗
VR
· Verena Ross Wiki · European Securities and Markets Authority WikiVerena Ross' Keynote speech at the ECSDA Conference, 18 November 2025

ContextKeynote by the ESMA Chair in Brussels at the conference of ECSDA, the association of European central securities depositories.

Why it mattersThe ESMA Chair on post-trade fragmentation, a hidden cost for European investors.

Problems raised
  1. Post-trade fragmentation raises costs.
  2. Settlement efficiency is uneven.
  3. Non-EU participants have concerns.
Solutions proposed
  1. Increase interoperability of post-trade systems.
  2. Improve settlement efficiency and supervisory convergence.
  3. Engage with industry and non-EU participants.
Read full speech on esma.europa.eu ↗Open Dark Majestic article
in a new window ↗

4 older speeches on this topic: use the all speeches.